MAHIUDDIN AND 6 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P.THRU. CHIEF SECY. HOME LKO. AND ANOTHERS
/3409/2025 · 2025-09-23
Shree Prakash Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 135014 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 135014 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 3409 of 2025 Court No. - 14 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J. Heard learned counsel for the applicants, Mr. Israr Siddiqui holding brief of Sri Dinesh Kr. Chaudhary, learned counsel for opposite party no. 2, learned AGA for the State as well as perused the record. The instant application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed with the prayer to quash the chargesheet No. 01 dated 19.06.2024 in Criminal Case No. 839 of 2024; State Vs. Mahiuddin and others, arising out of FIR/Case Crime No. 0090 of 2024, under Sections 498A, 323, 506 IPC and Section 3/4 of Dowry Prohibition Act, Police Station Tulsipur, District Balrampur and summoning order dated 23.10.2024, as well as entire proceedings in pursuance thereof. It is submitted by learned counsel for the applicants that vide order date 05.08.2025, the matter was referred to Mediation & Conciliation Centre of this Court, wherein parties appeared and have settled their dispute by way of entering into a settlement/agreement dated 02.09.2025. He submits that there is no dispute further in between the parties, therefore, the criminal proceedings against the applicants may be quashed. The learned counsel appearing for opposite party no. 2 has also Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Tripathi B.G. Balak Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Dinesh Kr. Chaudhary Mahiuddin And 6 Others .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P.Thru. Chief Secy. Home Lko. And Anothers .....Opposite Party(s)
supported the version of learned counsel for the applicants. The learned AGA for the State has also no objection to the contentions aforesaid. From perusal of the ordersheet and the records, it transpires that the mediator has sent a report dated 02.09.2025, while appending the settlement/agreement dated 02.09.2025. From perusal of the same, it transpires that the parties have settled their dispute amicably and at Point 'D' of the settlement/agreement, they have agreed to withdraw the cases against each other. This Court has noticed that the learned counsel for opposite party no. 2 has also supported the aforesaid facts. Considering the submissions of learned counsel for the parties, report of mediator and the settlement/agreement in between the parties, the instant application u/s 482 Cr.P.C. is hereby allowed and the criminal proceedings of Criminal Case No. 839 of 2024; State Vs.
Mahiuddin and others, arising out of FIR/Case Crime No. 0090 of 2024, under Sections 498A, 323, 506 IPC and Section 3/4 of Dowry Prohibition Act, Police Station Tulsipur, District Balrampur, are hereby quashed. The settlement/agreement shall be the part of this order. Consequences to be followed. Consigned to records. September 23, 2025 kkv/ A482 No. 3409 of 2025 2 (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- KRISHAN KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench