SHIV BARAN AND 6 OTHERS v. DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF CONSOLIDATION, AMETH AND 2 OTHERS
A227/2233/2025 · 2025-04-21
Saurabh Lavania
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 134995 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 134995 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:22221 Court No. - 7 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 2233 of 2025 Petitioner :- Shiv Baran And 6 Others Respondent :- Deputy Director Of Consolidation, Ameth And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Arvind Kumar Mishra Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Saurabh Lavania,J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned State counsel. In view of order proposed to be passed, issuance of notice to the private-respondent(s) is hereby dispensed with. The instant petition has been preferred seeking following main relief(s):-
"Issue an order or direction, directing to the opposite party no. 1 i.e. Deputy Director of Consolidation, District Amethi to decide the case по. 0914 of 2024, Computerized no. 202454047100000914 and old Revision No. 298 of 2024 and new Revision No. 215 of 2025 (Shiv Baran and others Vs. Samar Bahadur and another), U/s 48(1) Consolidation of Holding Act, 1953 filed against the order dated 30.05.2023 passed in appeal no. 140 of 2023 (Shiv Baran and others Vs. Shiv Charan and others), U/s 11 (1) of Consolidation of Holding Act, 1953 within the time stipulated by this Hon'ble Court which is pending before him, in the interest of justice. (Contained in Annexure No. 1) with this petition." Taking note of Rule 183(4) of the U.P. Revenue Code Rules, 2016 made under U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 and para 458(2) of U.P. Revenue Court Manual, as per which, revision or appeal should preferably be decided preferably within six months, however, in the instant case, the case is pending since 2024 and on account of pendency of the same, the petitioners, as stated, are suffering great hardship and mental agony, this petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent No.1/Deputy Director of Consolidation, District Amethi to consider and decide the case(s) in issue, indicated in prayer clause quoted above, most expeditiously after affording full opportunity of hearing to the parties to the litigation and without granting unnecessary adjournment to either party preferably within a period of six months from the next date fixed in the case, if there is no other legal impediment in this regard. It is made clear that the Court has not examined the case of either party on merits and the Authority concerned shall be free to decide the matter strictly in accordance with law. With the aforesaid, the petition is disposed of.
Order Date :- 21.4.2025 Arun/- Digitally signed by :- ARUN KUMAR GANGWAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench