ARYAN SINGH @ SAURABH AND 2 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. HOME, LKO AND 2 OTHERS
CRLA/1188/2025 · 2025-04-21
Alok Mathur
Criminal Appealbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 134978 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 134978 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:22343 Court No. - 12 Case :- CRIMINAL APPEAL No. - 1188 of 2025 Appellant :- Aryan Singh @ Saurabh And 2 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home, Lko And 2 Others Counsel for Appellant :- Ram Krishna Pratap Singh Counsel for Respondent :- G.A. Hon'ble Alok Mathur,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the appellants as well as learned AGA on behalf of the State. 2. The present appeal U/S 14 A(1) Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act has been filed against the summoning order dated 29.05.2024 passed by Court of Special Judge (SC/ST) Act, Lucknow in Session Case No.1145 of 2024 as well as against Final Report / Chargesheet No.01/2024 filed under Sections 323, 504 IPC and Section 3(1) (Da), 3(1)(Dha) and 3(2)(Va) of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 (Amendment 2015), dated 15.04.2024 in FIR No.0072/2024, dated 16.03.2024, under Sections 323, 504 filed against the appellant in Case Crime No.0077/2023, under Sections 323, 504, IPC and Section 3(1)(Da), 3(1)(Dha) and 3(2)(Va) of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 (Amendment 2015), Police Station - Malihabad, District - Lucknow (West Commissionerate)
3. Learned counsel for appellants, after arguing the matter at some length, submits that grievance of appellant shall be substantially redressed in case appellant is granted liberty to file bail application before the Court concerned, which may be decided in view of law laid down by Supreme Court in
"Satender Kumar Antil versus Central Bureau of Investigation and another, Special Leave to Appeal (Cri)No.5191 of 2021". 4. Learned A.G.A. has no objection in case suitable directions are issued to the Court concerned to consider and decide the applicant's application for bail in view of the law laid down by
the Apex Court in the case of Satender Kumar Antil (supra). 5. In view of the above, prayer for quashing the chargesheet as well as summoning order is refused. So far as other prayer is concerned, it is provided that in case the appellant appears before the trial Court within two weeks from today and apply for bail, the same shall be decided expeditiously, in view of the law laid down by Supreme Court in Satender Kumar Antil's case (supra). 6. The application is accordingly disposed of.
[Alok Mathur,J.] Order Date :- 21.4.2025 KR Digitally signed by :- RABINDRA KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench