Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 134947 (ALL)

JANE ALAM KHADIM v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. SPECIAL CHIEF SECY. MINORITY WELFARE AND WAQF U.P. LKO. AND 4 OTHERS

WRIA/4307/2025 · 2025-04-24

Rajesh Singh Chauhan

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:23520 Court No. - 3 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 4307 of 2025 Petitioner :- Jane Alam Khadim Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Special Chief Secy. Minority Welfare And Waqf U.P. Lko. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Mata Prasad Chaturvedi,Mohammad Mustaqeem Khan Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Farhan Habib Hon'ble Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J. 1. Heard Sri Mata Prasad Chaturvedi, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Ravi Swaroop Tiwari, learned Addl. Chief Standing Counsel for the State-opposite parties no.1, 3 & 4 and Sri Syed Aftab Ahmad, who has filed Vakalatnama on behalf of opposite party no.5. Said Vakalatnama is taken on record. Notice for opposite party no.2 has been accepted by Sri Farhan Habib. 2. By means of this petition, the petitioner has prayed following main reliefs:- "i. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding and directing the opposite parties no.2 to 5 to decide the representation dated 10.02.2025, contained as Annexure No.7 to this petition, in the interest of justice. ii. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding and directing the opposite parties to provide the salary of the petitioner from 01.05.2007 to till date, in the interest of justice." 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that for redressal of the aforesaid grievance, the petitioner has preferred representation to the competent authority, but to no avail. Learned counsel for the petitioner has also submitted that the petitioner may be permitted to prefer a fresh representation before opposite party no.5 and this Court may direct opposite party no.5 to pass appropriate order strictly in accordance with law. 4. Learned counsels for the opposite parties have no objection if direction for disposal of the representation is issued. 5. Therefore, without entering into merits of the issue, the petitioner is permitted to prefer a fresh representation to opposite party no.5 i.e. President, Waqf Dargah Syed Salar Masood Ghazi (RH), Bahraich, U.P. taking all pleas and grounds, which are necessary for disposal of the representation and also enclosing the earlier representation, if any, alongwith certified copy of this order within a period of fifteen days from today. If such representation is preferred by the petitioner within the aforesaid stipulated time, the authority concerned shall consider and dispose of the aforesaid representation of the petitioner by speaking and reasoned order, strictly in accordance with law, with expedition, say within a period of two months from the date of receipt of the representation and thereafter communicate the decision thereof to the petitioner forthwith. 6. With the aforesaid direction, the writ petition is disposed of finally. [Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J.] Order Date :- 24.4.2025 RBS/- Digitally signed by :- RAM BIR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench