APHC010162922025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3329] FRIDAY ,THE FOURTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 8886/2025 Between: Seethini Bhagya Sree ...PETITIONER AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. VENKATESWARLU GADA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO:8886/2025 ORDER: The present writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking following relief: “to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction of the respondents in rectifying the entries in revenue records of the subject properties in favour of the petitioner for an extent of Ac.0.03 cents in Sy.No. 43/10, for an extent of Ac.0.01 cents in Sy.No.43/13, for an extent of Ac.0.03 cents in Sy.No.43/25, for an extent of Ac.0.03 cents in Sy.No.43/26 of total extent of Ac.0.10 cents and for an extent of Ac.0.03 cents in Sy.No.43/4, for an extent of Ac.0.01 cents in Sy.No.43/5, for an extent of Ac.0.05 cents in Sy.No.43/6, for an extent of Ac.0.021 cents in Sy.No.43/8 of total extent of Ac.0.30 cents and for an extent of Ac.0.03 cents in Sy.No.53/12 and for an extent of Ac.0.06 cents in Sy.No.58/28 and for an extent of Ac.0.07 cents in Sy.No.58/35 and for an extent of Ac.0.06 cents in Sy.No.66/19 of total an extent of Ac.0.62 cents or 0.251 Hectors situated in Marripalem Village, Parawada Mandal, Lankalapalem, Anakapalli, Visakhapatnam District even though petitioner made Mee-Seva online application dated 14.10.2020 thereafter submitted Spandana representation dated 11.12.2023 for consideration of the same is highly illegal, arbitrary and violation of Art 14, 21, 300-A of Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to consider the Mee-Seva online application dated 14.10.2020 and Spandana application dated 11.12.2023 by mutating the name of the petitioner in revenue records for the above subject land and pass such other order or orders….” 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Government Pleader for Revenue for the respondents. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner herein is the absolute owner and possessor of the land admeasuring to an extent of Ac.0.03 cents in Sy.No. 43/10, for an extent of Ac.0.01 cents in Sy.No.43/13, for an extent of Ac.0.03 cents in Sy.No.43/25, for an extent of Ac.0.03 cents in Sy.No.43/26 of total extent of Ac.0.10 cents and for an extent of Ac.0.03 cents in Sy.No.43/4, for an extent of Ac.0.01 cents in Sy.No.43/5, for an extent of Ac.0.05 cents in Sy.No.43/6, for an extent of Ac.0.021 cents in Sy.No.43/8 of total extent of Ac.0.30 cents and for an extent of Ac.0.03 cents in Sy.No.53/12 and for an extent of Ac.0.06 cents in Sy.No.58/28 and for an extent of Ac.0.07 cents in Sy.No.58/35 and for an extent of Ac.0.06 cents in Sy.No.66/19 of total an extent of Ac.0.62 cents or 0.251 Hectors situated in Marripalem Village, Parawada Mandal, Lankalapalem, Anakapalli, Visakhapatnam District having acquired the same through her ancestors vide registered settlement deed dated 26.08.2016. Thereafter, the petitioner herein approached respondent No.4 seeking for mutation of her name in respect of the subject properties in the revenue records and for issuance of pattadar pass book and title deed in her favour. But the respondent authorities did not choose to consider the same. Later, the petitioner herein submitted a Mee-Seva application dated 14.10.2020 and a Spandana application on 11.12.2023 requesting the respondents authorities to mutate her name in the revenue records in respect of the subject properties. Even after receipt of the said representations, the respondents neither considered the same nor issued any other proceedings. Hence, the writ petition. 4. On the other hand, learned Government Pleader for Revenue submits that in order to mutate the name of the petitioner in the revenue records in respect of the subject properties, the petitioner herein has to make an appropriate application in Form-6A to respondent No.4 through Mee-seva by paying requisite fee. In the absence of the same, the petitioner herein is not entitled to claim mutation of her name in respect of the subject properties in the revenue records based on the representations submitted by her. He further submits that let there be a direction to the petitioner to submit a fresh application seeking for mutation of her name in the revenue records and to issue pattadar pass book in Form-6A through Mee-seva/ AP Online/ Village Secretariats by following proper procedure in terms of G.O.Ms. No.209 dated 14.06.2017 to the respondent No.4 by paying requisite fee. On receipt of such application, the respondents will consider the same, within a reasonable time. 5. Having regard to the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Government Pleader for the respondents and on perusal of the material placed on record, this Court is of the considered view that the present writ petition can be disposed of, directing the petitioner to make an appropriate application in Form-6A strictly adhering to the provisions of the Andhra Pradesh Land in Pattadar Pass Books Act, 1971 and Rules framed therein from time to time for mutation of her name in the concerned revenue records through MeeSeva/ AP Online/ Village Secretariat and also in terms of G.O.Ms.No.209 dated 14.06.2017 and on payment of requisite fee, within a period of two (2) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. On receipt of such application, the respondents are directed to consider the same and pass appropriate orders, after providing opportunity of hearing to all the parties concerned, within a period of three (03) months, thereafter. 6. With the above directions, the writ petition is disposed of. No costs. Consequently, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in the writ petition shall stand closed. _______________________________ VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA, J 04.04.2025 BSP 157 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION No.8886 of 2025 04.04.2025 BSP