Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 13491 (AP)

M.Neeraja v. R.Narasimha Reddy

CMA/395/2009 · 2025-07-16

A Hari Haranadha Sarma, B Krishna Mohan

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010163322009 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH THURSDAY, TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 395/2009 Between: 1. M.NEERAJA, W/O.R.NARASIMHA REDDDY HOUSEWIFE C/O.M.SREENIVASA REDDY, H.NO.18/82 KUNROOL. 1. R NARASIMHA REDDY, S/o.Bayya Reddy, Hindu Working Z.P.High School R/o.Hampapuram, Raptadu Mandal, Anantapur. Appeal Under Section_____against orders IA NO: 1 OF 2009(CMAMP 106 OF 2009 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased condone the delay of 214 days in representing the appeal IA NO: 2 OF 2009(CMAMP 107 OF 2009 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in su condone the delay of 33 days in filing the appeal against trhe order and decree dated 24.11.2007 passed in MOP No.39/2005 on the file of Prl.Senior Civil Judge, Kurnool IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A. HARI HARANADHA SARMA CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 395/2009 M.NEERAJA, W/O.R.NARASIMHA REDDDY HOUSEWIFE C/O.M.SREENIVASA REDDY, H.NO.18/82-A23, KAMALANAGAR, ...APPELLANT AND R NARASIMHA REDDY, S/o.Bayya Reddy, Hindu Working Z.P.High School R/o.Hampapuram, Raptadu Mandal, Anantapur. ...RESPONDENT Appeal Under Section_____against orders IA NO: 1 OF 2009(CMAMP 106 OF 2009 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated iled in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased condone the delay of 214 days in representing the appeal IA NO: 2 OF 2009(CMAMP 107 OF 2009 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased condone the delay of 33 days in filing the appeal against trhe order and decree dated 24.11.2007 passed in MOP No.39/2005 on the file of Prl.Senior IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3527] SEVENTEENTH DAY OF JULY THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN A. HARI HARANADHA SARMA CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 395/2009 M.NEERAJA, W/O.R.NARASIMHA REDDDY HOUSEWIFE A23, KAMALANAGAR, ...APPELLANT R NARASIMHA REDDY, S/o.Bayya Reddy, Hindu Working as Teacher, Z.P.High School R/o.Hampapuram, Raptadu Mandal, Anantapur. ...RESPONDENT Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated iled in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated pport of the petition, the High Court may be pleased condone the delay of 33 days in filing the appeal against trhe order and decree dated 24.11.2007 passed in MOP No.39/2005 on the file of Prl.Senior 2 HBKM,J & AHHS,J C.M.A.No.395 of 2009 IA NO: 3 OF 2009(CMAMP 722 OF 2009 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the order dated 24-11-2007 passed in MOP No. 39 of 2005 on the file of Principal Senior Civil Judge, Kurnool, pending disposal of the CMA before this Hon'ble Court and pass Counsel for the Appellant: 1. C PRAKASH REDDY Counsel for the Respondent: 1. GUTTAPALEM VIJAYA KUMAR 3 HBKM,J & AHHS,J C.M.A.No.395 of 2009 The Court made the following: JUDGMENT: (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice B. Krishna Mohan) The learned counsel for the appellant seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the Appeal, for which, he submitted the court slip, dated 10.07.2025. 2. Permission is accorded. 3. Accordingly, the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. Interim order, if any, deemed to have been vacated. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________ JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN _________________________________ JUSTICE A.HARI HARANADHA SARMA 17.07.2025 MDP