CHANDRA SHEKHAR SHUKLA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. REVENUE LKO. AND OTHERS
WRIC/3723/2025 · 2025-04-21
Om Prakash Shukla, Rajan Roy
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 134896 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 134896 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:22398-DB Court No. - 2 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 3723 of 2025 Petitioner :- Chandra Shekhar Shukla Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Lko. And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Roshani Pandey,Ashutosh Dhar Dubey Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Rajan Roy,J. Hon'ble Om Prakash Shukla,J.
1. Heard.
2. The petitioner claims to be Manager of Shri Raghunath Das Smarak Prathmik Vidyalaya, Badi Chhawani Kuti Annadipur Bihara Mawai, District Ayodhya.
3. From perusal of Annexure-1 which is report of Sub Divisional Magistrate, Rudauli, Ayodhya what comes out is that some inquiry is underway relating to the land mentioned by the aforesaid institution for seeking recognition and it has been found that part of Institution is constructed on Gata No. 462 which is recorded in the name of Mahanth Shri Jagdish Das Shastri Chela Mahanth Prem Narayan Das Sarvahakar Thakur Ram Janki Badi Chhawani Ayodhya and another part of the Institution is built on Gata no. 482 which is recorded in the name of Nishant Ali Khan and others and boundary of the Institution has been built on three sides on Gata No. 483 which is recorded in the name of Baba Raghunath Das Smarak Madhyamik Vidyalaya Badi Chhawani Kuti Pure Anandi Bihara through Manager i.e. the Institution itself. The land bearing Gata No. 463 which is recorded as road has been included inside the boundary wall of the Institution. Part of boundary wall is on Gata No. 481 which is recorded in the name of Rukmini wife of Sarjoo. Except for Gata No. 483 there is no other land in the name of the Institution.
4. This petition is for handing possession of plot no. 483. The petition is absolutely misconceived. The Institution has not come to the Court. Some individual claiming to be Manager has come to Court. Even otherwise, such a relief cannot be considered under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.
5. The writ petition is disposed of. [Om Prakash Shukla, J.] [Rajan Roy, J.] Order Date :- 21.4.2025 Santosh/- Digitally signed by :- SANTOSH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench