RADHNA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND 3 OTHERS
CRLP/3224/2025 · 2025-04-18
Ram Manohar Narayan Mishra, Vivek Chaudhary
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 134879 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 134879 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:22009-DB Court No. - 10 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 3224 of 2025 Petitioner :- Radhna Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Mulayam Singh Yadav Counsel for Respondent :- G.A. Hon'ble Vivek Chaudhary,J. Hon'ble Ram Manohar Narayan Mishra,J.
1. Heard Shri Mulayam Singh Yadav, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned AGA for State-respondent(s) and perused the material available on record.
2. This petition seeks issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus commanding the opposite party nos. 2 to 3 to not to harass the petitioner in respect of Case Crime No.465 of 2024 under Sections 376, 392, 504 IPC, police station Kotwali Rudauli, District Ayodhya which is lodged against the brother of the petitioner, who is living in Dubai.
3. Learned AGA, on the basis of instructions, states that police is not harassing the petitioner in any manner whatsoever as the petitioner is not required in the matter. The statement of learned AGA is taken on record.
4. The writ petition is accordingly consigned to record. (Ram Manohar Narayan Mishra, J.) (Vivek Chaudhary, J.) Order Date :- 18.4.2025 Arnima Digitally signed by :- ARNIMA SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench