1 2025:CGHC:13309 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 1456 of 2025 1 - Karambai Kesharwani D/o Shri Jhunnilal Kesharwani Aged About 76 Years R/o Village- Baikunthpur, Tehsil And District- Raigarh (C.G.) ... Petitioner versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Revenue Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Nava Raipur, Atal Nagar, District- Raipur (C.G.) 2 - Collector Raigarh, District- Raigarh (C.G.) 3 - The Sub-Divisional Officer Raigarh, District- Raigarh (C.G.) 4 - Tehsildar Raigarh, District- Raigarh (C.G.) 5 - Revenue Inspector Raigarh, District- Raigarh (C.G.) 6 - The Patwari Patwari Halka No.-13, Village- Baikunthpur, Tahsil- Raigarh, District- Raigarh (C.G.) ... Respondent(s) (Cause-title taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner : Mr. Raj Kumar Sahu, Advocate For State/Respondent(s) : Mr. Santosh Bharat, Panel Lawyer Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad RAVI SHANKAR MANDAVI Digitally signed by RAVI SHANKAR MANDAVI Date: 2025.03.24 12:11:23 +0530 2 Order on Board 20/03/2025 1. Heard Mr. Raj Kumar Sahu, learned counsel petitioners as well as Mr. Santosh Bharat, learned Panel Lawyer for the respondent/s. 2. By way of this writ petition, the petitioners have prayed for following reliefs: “10.1 That this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to call for entire records pertaining to the case of the petitioners. 10.2 That this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondent authorities to demarcate the land of petitioner, within stipulated period of time, in the interest of justice. 10.3 That, any other relief which this Court finds just and proper may also be granted to the petitioner, in the interest of justice.” 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that after purchasing of land, the demarcation application has been filed, but it has not been considered and lying pending before the concerned Tehsildar/respondent. 4. Learned counsel for the respondent has not opposed the submissions advanced by the learned counsel for the petitioner and submit that the petitioner has not approached before the authorities in accordance with law. 3 5. In view of the above submissions made by the learned counsel for the parties, learned counsel for the petitioner is directed to approach the concerned Tehsildar for his grievances which relates to demarcation of land after purchasing of said land, and the concerned Tehsildar is directed to decide the application of petitioner for demarcation of land in accordance with law. 6. With the aforesaid observations and directions, this petition stands disposed of. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Ravi Mandavi