VIKRANT @ VIKRANT VAISH v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. HOME LKO. AND ANOTHER
A482/3315/2025 · 2025-04-18
Saral Srivastava
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 134849 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 134849 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:22151 Court No. - 19 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 3315 of 2025 Applicant :- Vikrant @ Vikrant Vaish Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home Lko. And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Sakshi Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Saral Srivastava,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State.
2. Applicant by means of present application has prayed for following relief:
"(i) Quash the impugned charge sheet no.207/2012, u/s 384, 294, 506 of IPC, P.S. Cantt, District-Ayodhya (conatined in Annexure 1 to the application) as against the applicants. (ii) Quash the impugned summoning order dated 18/01/2013, passed by Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate 2nd, Distt-Ayodhya, in Case No.69/2013; State Vs. Vikrant; to face trial U/s 384, 294, 506 I.P.C., P.S. Cantt, District Ayodhya (contained in Annexure 2 to the application) as against the applicant."
3. After some arguments, learned counsel for the applicant has made a statement at the Bar that he does not want to press other prayers made in the prayer clause and has confined his prayer only to the relief that the applicant is ready to surrender before the trial court and in case, applicant files an application for bail, his bail application may be considered and disposed off in view of law laid down by Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Satender Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another reported in (2021) 10 SCC 773.
4. Per contra, learned AGA has opposed the prayer.
5. In view of the above statement, it is directed that in case, the applicant appears before the trial court within 30 days from today and applies for bail, his bail application be considered and disposed off in view of law laid down by Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Satender Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another (supra) after hearing both the parties.
6. For a period of 30 days from today or till the applicant surrenders and moves such an application for bail, whichever is earlier, no coercive measure shall be taken against the applicant in the aforesaid case.
7. With the aforesaid observations, the application u/s 482 Cr.P.C. is finally disposed off. Order Date :- 18.4.2025 Mohit Digitally signed by :- MOHIT KUMAR KUSHWAHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench