2025:UHC:8123 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS BA1 No.2448 of 2024 Hon’ble Alok Mahra, J. Mr. R.S. Sammal, Ms. Sarita Bisht and Mr. Karan Singh Dugtal, Advocates for the applicant. Mr. V.S. Rawat, A.G.A. for the State of Uttarakhand. 2. This first bail application has been moved by the applicant seeking regular bail in Case Crime No.26 of 2024, under Sections 318(4), 3(5) & 61(2) of Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Section 66(D) of the Information Technology Act, 2008, registered at P.S. Cyber Crime Police Station Rudrapur, District Udham Singh Nagar. 3. According to the F.I.R., one Priya and Tina Mittal made telephonic calls to the complainant to invest in Barclays Stock Pull Group E17, which deals in trading of shares. The complainant deposited in total about a sum of ₹64,00,000/-, out of which ₹32,00,000/- were deposited in the account, which is in the name of the applicant. Thereafter, matter was investigated and charge sheet has been filed. 4. It is contended by learned counsel for the applicant that applicant has falsely been implicated in the instant crime; has no criminal history and is languishing in jail since 28.09.2024. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that bare perusal of the F.I.R. and charge sheet would reveal that there was no direct conversation between the applicant and the complainant; that no offence of cheating is made out against the applicant, as he has not induced the complainant for depositing the said amount; that there are very less chances of applicant influencing the witnesses, as charge sheet 2025:UHC:8123 has already been filed and investigation relates to documentary and electronic evidence. He submits that applicant is the only bread earner in the family and, due to his detention, his entire family is at the verge of starvation. He submits that in case, the applicant is granted bail, he will not misuse the same and will furnish the bail surety as per the satisfaction of this Court. 5. Learned State Counsel vehemently opposed the bail application and submits that on the basis of oral as well as documentary evidence, the Investigating Officer found cogent and credible evidence against the applicant, therefore, he is not entitled to bail. 6. Considering the submission of learned counsel for the parties and without expressing any opinion as to the final merits of the case, this Court is of the view that applicant deserves bail at this stage. 7. The bail application is allowed. 8. Let the applicant, namely, Balveer Singh be released on bail, on executing personal bond and furnishing two reliable sureties, each of like amount, to the satisfaction of Court concerned. (Alok Mahra, J.) 12.09.2025 Arpan ARPAN JAISWAL Digitally signed by ARPAN JAISWAL DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=eabb68a3895e41937c266c23964c0485365445e3a20dddb73933 98f9fe45ba3e, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=060FC17022BEAE3DE215D68D9D454C5109CB987446351 E4DF04AADAA2C2CEA66, cn=ARPAN JAISWAL Date: 2025.09.12 16:56:47 +05'30'