Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 134767 (ALL)

ARUN KUMAR YADAV AND ANOTHER v. DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, LKO. AND OTHERS

WRIC/3748/2025 · 2025-05-07

Om Prakash Shukla, Rajan Roy

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:26865-DB Court No. - 2 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 3748 of 2025 Petitioner :- Arun Kumar Yadav And Another Respondent :- District Magistrate, Lko. And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Brijendra Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Shishir Jain Hon'ble Rajan Roy,J. Hon'ble Om Prakash Shukla,J. (C. M. Application No. 2 of 2025) This is an application for amendment in the memo of writ petition. Heard Shri Brijendra Singh, learned counsel for the petitioners, Shri Manish Mishra, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State and Shri Shishir Jain, learned counsel for the Bridge Corporation. The application for amendment is allowed. Order on writ petition During the course of argument learned counsel for the petitioners admitted that the land of the petitioners has not been utilized as yet by the opposite parties for any public purpose, but, it is proposed to be acquired. Learned counsel for the Bridge Corporation and learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State also state that it has not been utilized as yet, but, is proposed to be so utilized whether based on purchase or compulsorily acquisition, therefore, we see no reason to interfere in the matter. The writ petitioner is disposed of in the light of the aforesaid. The petitioners can not be compelled to sell their land for inadequate consideration of course it could be acquired compulsorily but as per law. . (Om Prakash Shukla,J.) (Rajan Roy,J.) Order Date :- 7.5.2025 R.K.P. Digitally signed by :- RAJ KUMAR PATEL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench