PUSHPENDRA KUMAR v. THE STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. MEDICAL HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE DEPTT. LKO. AND 2 OTHERS
WRIA/4199/2025 · 2025-05-05
Karunesh Singh Pawar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 134766 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 134766 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:25772 Court No. - 18 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 4199 of 2025 Petitioner :- Pushpendra Kumar Respondent :- The State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Medical Health And Family Welfare Deptt. Lko. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Anshu Singh,Krishna Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Karunesh Singh Pawar,J.
1. In view of the proposed order being passed, notices to respondent No.3 is dispensed with. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Anirudh Singh, learned Standing Counsel for respondent nos.1 and 2. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is presently working as Additional Chief Medical Officer, Ayodhya by ignoring the petitioner's seniority as well as the policy framed by the State Government dated 14.06.2011. He submits that one Dr. Sushil Kumar Baniyan has been posted as Chief Medical Officer in District-Ayodhya whose seniority number is 10314-Ka whereas the petitioner's seniority number is 10287. The policy issued by the State Government dated 14.06.2011 provides that at the time of appointment to the post of Chief Medical Officer/ Chief Medical Superintendent/ District Tuberculosis Officer, it will be ensured that no doctor senior to the doctor posted on the said post under his establishment is working under him. 4. He submits that action of the opposite parties is arbitrary and petitioner is humiliated as he has been posted under his junior which is against the policy of the State Government. 5. Learned standing counsel on the basis of written instructions has submitted that it is true that petitioner is senior to Dr. Sushil Kumar Baniyan who is presently posted as a CMO however, the
petitioner has not given any representation to bring this anomaly in the knowledge of the State Government. He submits that in case the petitioner gives a representation then considering his seniority he will be posted as a place where he will not be required to work under his junior, the instructions provided by learned standing counsel are taken on record. The relevant part of the written instructions are extracted below:-
"(1)
डड० ससजय जजन,
ततकडललन ममखय चचचकतसडधधकडरल अययधयड,
जय चदनडसक 31.12.2024
कय अपनल अधधवररतड आयम पपरर कर ससवडचनववत हय रहस थस.
कस दडरड ममखय
चचचकतसडधधकडरल अययधयड कस पद कड पभडर डड० पमषपसनद कम मडर कय सथडनलय वयवसथड कस
अनतररत हसतरत चकयड रयड थड। इस पकडर डड० पमषपसनद कम मडर दडरड कडयरवडहक ममखय
चचचकतसडधधकडरल अययधयड कस रप मम कडयर चकयड जड रहड थड। (2)
सडमडनयतत चकसल जनपद मम अपर ममखय चचचकतसडधधकडरल कस पद पर तजनडत
चचचकतसक कय उसल जनपद मम चनयचमत रप सस ममखय चचचकतसडधधकडरल कस पद पर तजनडत
नहह चकयड जडतड हज। कययचक चनकट भपतकडल मम धजन अधधकडररयय कस सडथ वह समकक
रप सस कडयर कर रहस हयतस हह उन पर अनमशडसन व चनयसतर रखनस मम असमचवधड हयतल हज। (3)
चकसल भल रडजककय चचचकतसक दडरड चकसल जनपद चवशसर मम पशडसचनक पद पर सवयस
कय इचछडनमसडर तजनडत चकयस जडनस कड अनमतयर अधधकडर सवरप नहह मडरड जड सकतड हज। (4)
यडचल दडरड ररट यडचचकड कस सडथ कयई पतयडवसदन नहह चदयड रयड हज। यचद यडचल दडरड
पतयडवसदन चदयड रयड हयतड,
तय उनकय सममचचत पद /
सथडन पर तजनडत चकयड जड सकतड थड। (5)
चपसचक यडचल वतरमडन ममखय चचचकतसडधधकडरल,
अययधयड सस वररष हह। यचद यडचल दडरड
कयई पतयडवसदन चदयड जडतड हज,
तय रडजय सरकडर यडचल कक वररषतड कय धयडन मम रखतस हहए
चकसल उपयमक पद पर तजनडत करनस पर चवचडर कर सकतल हज,
जहडस वह चकसल कचनष
अधधकडरल कस अधलन न हय। 4-
पशनरत ररट यडचचकड मम चदनडक 05.05.2025
कय सनमवडई चनयत हज। अतत इस सबसध मम
ममझस यह कहनस कड चनदसश हहआ हज चक कव पयड उपरयक वचररत तथयय सस मड० उचच
नयडयडलय कय अवरत करडनस कड कष करम।"
6. In view of the undertaking given by learned standing counsel on the basis of aforesaid written instructions, the liberty is granted to the petitioner to submit a fresh a representation to the opposite party No.1 i.e. Principal Secretary Medical & Health Department of U.P. Government, Swasthya Bhawan, Kaiserbagh, Lucknow within a period of one week from today. 7.
In case such a representation is given to the opposite party No.1, a decision shall be taken by it within a further period of two weeks keeping in view the policy of the State Government as alleged in the writ petition so also the undertaking given
before this Court on the basis of written instructions and shall post the petitioner at a suitable place taking into consideration the status of the petitioner in seniority. 8. With the aforesaid observations, the writ petition is disposed of. Order Date :- 5.5.2025 Saurabh Yadav/- Digitally signed by :- SAURABH YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench