NEELIMA VADDINA v. ANANYA DAS, PROJECT DIRECTOR, OSEPA,KHURDA
CONTC/521/2025 · 2025-04-30
Biraja Prasanna Satapathy
Writ Petition (Civil)body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 13475 (ORI) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 13475 (ORI) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
CONTC No.521 of 2025
Neelima Vaddina & Ors.
….
Petitioners Mr. P.K. Panda, Advocate
-versus- Ananya Das, Project Director, OSEPA, Khurda …. Opposite Party Mr. M.R. Mohanty, AGA
CORAM:
JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY
Order No.
ORDER
30.04.2025
01. 1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Arrangement (Virtual/Physical) Mode.
2. Heard learned counsel appearing for the Parties.
3. This Contempt Petition has been filed by the Petitioners for non-compliance of the order dated 02.12.2024 passed by this Court in W.P.(C) No.29946 of 2024.
4. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and upon hearing learned counsel for the Parties, this Contempt Petition is disposed of by granting one month further time to the Opp. Party-Contemnor to comply the order passed on 02.12.2024. However, if the order is not complied with within the extended time, it will be held as deliberate violation of this Court’s order.
(Biraja Prasanna Satapathy)
Judge Madhusmita