PUSHPA DEVI v. COMMISSIONER, AYODHYA DIVISION, AYODHYA AND OTHERS
A227/2224/2025 · 2025-04-21
Saurabh Lavania
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 134733 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 134733 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:22224 Court No. - 7 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 2224 of 2025 Petitioner :- Pushpa Devi Respondent :- Commissioner, Ayodhya Division, Ayodhya And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Chhote Lal Yadav,Ajay Yadav Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Saurabh Lavania,J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned State counsel. In view of order proposed to be passed, issuance of notice to the private-respondent(s) is hereby dispensed with. The instant petition has been preferred seeking following main relief(s):-
"Wherefore, it is most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble court may kindly be pleased to direct the learned Commissioner Ayodhya Division Ayodhya/Faizabad (opposite party no.1) to decide the revision no.924/2016 (Parashu Ram and others versus Smt. Pushpa and others), under section-210 of U.P. Revenue Code- 2006, filed by the opposite party no. 2 to 7, pending before him since 2016, within a stipulated period in the interest of justice." Taking note of Rule 183(4) of the U.P. Revenue Code Rules, 2016 made under U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 and para 458(2) of U.P. Revenue Court Manual, as per which, revision or appeal should preferably be decided preferably within six months, however, in the instant case, the revision is pending since 2016 and on account of pendency of the same, the petitioner, as stated, who is lady, is suffering great hardship and mental agony, this petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent No.1/Commissioner, Ayodhya Division, Ayodhya to consider and decide the Revision No. 924/2016 (Parashu Ram and others versus Smt. Pushpa and others) most expeditiously after affording full opportunity of hearing to the parties to the litigation and without granting unnecessary adjournment to either party preferably within a period of six months from the next date fixed in the case, if there is no other legal impediment in this regard. It is made clear that the Court has not examined the case of either party on merits and the Authority concerned shall be free to decide the matter strictly in accordance with law. With the aforesaid, the petition is disposed of. Order Date :- 21.4.2025 Arun/- Digitally signed by :- ARUN KUMAR GANGWAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench