Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 134727 (MAD)

M.Mohanasundaram v. The State of Tamilnadu

WP(MD)/11081/2025 · 2025-04-22

P Dhanabal

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

W.P.(MD) No.11081 of 2025 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 22.04.2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.DHANABAL W.P.(MD) No.11081 of 2025 M.Mohanasundaram ... Petitioner Vs. 1. The State of Tamil Nadu, Represented through the Superintendent of Police, Karur. 2. The State of Tamil Nadu, Represented Through the Inspector of Police, Paramathi PS, Karur District. ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to take necessary action for petitioner complaints dated 02.02.2025, 13.03.2025, 27.03.2025 pending on the file of respondents within a reasonable time. For Petitioner : Mr.K.Kharikharadas For R1 & R2 : Mr.R.M.Anbunithi Additional Public Prosecutor (Crl. Side) O R D E R This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner to direct the respondents to take necessary action on the complaints of the petitioner _____________ Page No. 1 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.(MD) No.11081 of 2025 dated 02.02.2025, 13.03.2025 and 27.03.2025. 2. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner lodged a complaint against one Sumathi before the 2nd respondent on 02.02.2025, but no action was taken. Again, he sent representations on 13.03.2025 and 27.03.2025, but no action was taken. Therefore, he has filed this petition. 3. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor (Criminal Side) appearing for the respondents would submit that the petitioner lodged a complaint against one Sumathi without mentioning correct address. Similarly, the said Sumathi has also lodged a complaint against the petitioner. Both the complaints are under enquiry. They will conduct enquiry and take appropriate action in accordance with law within fifteen days. 4. Considering the prayer sought for in the petition and the 2nd respondent has also admitted the receipt of the complaint from the petitioner and another complaint was pending against the petitioner, this Court directs the 2nd respondent to conduct enquiry on the complaints of _____________ Page No. 2 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.(MD) No.11081 of 2025 both the parties and take appropriate action in accordance with law within a period of fifteen [15] days from the date of this order. 5. With the above said observation and direction, this writ petition is disposed of. 22.04.2025 Internet :Yes Index :Yes/No NCC :Yes/No Mac To 1. The Superintendent of Police, Karur. 2. The Inspector of Police, Paramathi PS, Karur District. 3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. _____________ Page No. 3 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.(MD) No.11081 of 2025 P.DHANABAL, J. Mac W.P.(MD) No.11081 of 2025 22.04.2025 _____________ Page No. 4 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis