Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 13472 (JHR)

KALIM ANSARI v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

WPC/2625/2025 · 2025-07-24

Rajesh Kumar

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:JHHC:20365 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(C) No.2625 of 2025 ---- Kalim Ansari, aged about 67 years, S/o Late Fakiruddin, resident of Village- Bargain, P.O-Bariyatu, P.S-Sadar, District-Ranchi …. …. Petitioner -Versus- 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. The Deputy Commissioner, Ranchi, Collectorate Building, P.O-G.P.O., P.S.- Kotwali, District-Ranchi 3. The Deputy Collector Land Reforms, Ranchi, Collectorate Building, P.O- G.P.O., P.S.-Kotwali, District-Ranchi 4. The Circle Officer, Bargain Anchal, Vijay Nagar, Ohdar Village, P.O & P.S. Bariyatu, District-Ranchi …. …. Respondents ---- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR ---- For the Petitioners : Mr. Abhishek Sriwastava, Advocate For the Respondents : Mr. Manish Kumar, S.C-II ---- 02/Dated: 24th July, 2025 1. The present writ petition has been filed for following reliefs:- (i) For a direction upon the Circle Officer, Bargain Anchal (Respondent No.4) to pass final order on the report submitted by the Karamchari in Misc. Case No.01/21-22 & 02/21-22 which was opened by the Circle Office on the application submitted by the petitioner and has been kept pending since the year 2021. (ii) Further, to demarcate the Khatiyani land of the petitioner under Khata No.21, Plot No.2583, having an area of 62 decimals and plot No.2371, 2377, 837, 1513, 1514 & 1515, having a area of 2.09 Acres, situated at Mauza-Bargain, which has been kept pending till date even after applications submitted by the petitioner on 30.07.2024 (Annexure-6) & 20.08.2024 (Annexure-6/1)”. 2. The description of land is as follows:- “Khata No.21, Plot No.2583, having in area of 62 decimals and Plot No.2371, 2377, 2378, 1513, 1514 & 1515 having an area of 2.09 Acres, situated at mauza-Bargain is the Khatiyani land of the petitioner. 3. After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present writ petition with a liberty to work out his remedy in accordance with law. 4. Learned counsel for the respondent has raised no objection. 5. Accordingly, the present writ petition is hereby, disposed of as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. (Rajesh Kumar, J.) Raja/-Uploaded