1 2025:CGHC:13016 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR CONT No. 338 of 2025 1 - Ganesh Ram Yadav S/o Mullu Ram Yadav Aged About 63 Years R/o Turkadih, Gutku, Bilaspur, Distt. Bilaspur (C.G.) 2 - Ramsundar Patel S/o Chamru Ram Patel Aged About 66 Years R/o Turkadih, Gutku, Bilaspur, Distt. Bilaspur (C.G.) 3 - Dukhani Bai Maravi W/o Pratap Singh Maravi Aged About 71 Years R/o Near Pani Tanki, Koni, Ward No. 01, Koni, Bilaspur, Distt.- Bilaspur (C.G.) 4 - Babulal Kaushik S/o Balwan Lal Kaushik Aged About 62 Years R/o Ward No. 68, Ramkrishna Paramhans Nagar, Barpara Road, Badi Koni, Bilaspur, Distt.- Bilaspur (C.G.) 5 - Janakram Patel S/o Mathura Patel Aged About 59 Years R/o Ward No. 01, Near Po- lice Station, Koni, Bilaspur, Distt.- Bilaspur (C.G.) 6 - Ramadhin Singh Gond S/o Mohan Ram Dhruw Aged About 62 Years R/o Ward No. 01, Near Police Station, Koni, Bilaspur, Distt.- Bilaspur (C.G.) ... Petitioners versus 1 - Mr. S. Bharathidasan Secretary, Department Of Technical Education, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar Nava Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 2 - Rajendra Kumar Patel- Joint Director Treasury Account And Pension, Bilaspur, Distt.- Bilaspur (C.G.) 3 - Dr. B S Chawla - Principal Government Engineering College, Bilaspur, Distt.- Bi- laspur (C.G.) ... Respondents ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- For Petitioners : Mr. Syed Majid Ali, Advocate For Respondents : Mr. Neeraj Sharma, Deeputy Advocate General --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hon'ble Shri Arvind Kumar Verma, Judge Order on Board 19.03.2025 1. The present contempt petition has been filed by the petitioners alleging non-compliance of order of this Court dated 06.11.2024 passed in WPS No. 2 7092 of 2024. Vide order dated 06.11.2024, this Court has passed the following order/direction:- “Taking into consideration the limited prayer made by learned counsel for petitioners, without commenting anything on the merits, this petition is disposed of in light of Faguvaram Patel (Supra) reserving liberty to the petitioners to make detailed representation before the concerned respondent/competent authority. In the event, petitioners submit representation, their claim shall be considered and decided, in accordance with the relevant rules and law expeditiously preferably within the period of ‘three months’ from the date of receipt of such representation, keeping in mind the decision in case of Faguvaram Patel(Supra). ” 2. Learned counsel for the petitionerss as well as the learned counsel for the State/respondents contended that the order passed by this court in WPS No. 7092 of 2024 vide order dated 06.11.2024 has been complied with. 3. I have heard learned counsel for the respective parties and perused the order passed by this court with utmost circumspection. 4. In view of the submission, made by the learned counsel for both the parties, this court is of the considered opinion that the order passed by this court in WPS No. 7092 of 2024 vide order dated 06.11.2024 has been complied with and there remains no willful disobedience on the part of the respondents. 5. Subsequently, this contempt petition is closed against the respondents and is subsequently disposed of. sd/- alfiza (Arvind Kumar Verma) Judge