Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 13471 (GAU)

SMT. KAUSHALYA RAY and 3 ORS v. SHIV CHARAN BARUAH and 7 ORS

CRP/333/2016 · 2025-05-01

Devashis Baruah

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010118412016 2025:GAU-AS:5435 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : CRP/333/2016 SMT. KAUSHALYA RAY and 3 ORS W/O LT. BHABENDRA CH. RAY 2: MANINDRA CH. RAY S/O LT. BHABENDRA CH. RAY 3: KUSHAL RAY S/O LT. BHABENDRA CH. RAY 4: DHIRESWAR RAY S/O LT. BHABENDRA CH. RAY. ALL ARE R/O BAKHARAPARA PART-I P.O. and P.S. and DIST- BONGAIGAO VERSUS SHIV CHARAN BARUAH and 7 ORS S/O LT. DHARANI KANTA BARUAH 2:BHAKENDRA BARUAH S/O LT. DHARANI KANTA BARUAH 3:DOMASHU BARUAH S/O LT. GOBINDRA BARUAH 4:DASARATH BARUAH S/O LT. ASHOK BARUAH 5:GAURI SHANKAR BARUAH S/O LT. BHABANI BARUAH 6:PREMA NANDA BARUAH S/O LT. BHABANI BARUAH Page No.# 2/2 7:JAMINI BARUAH S/O LT. BHABANI BARUAH 8:RAMKRISHNA BARUAH S/O LT. PRABHAT BARUAH ALL ARE R/O NAGARIA GAON P.O. MULAGAON DIST- BONGAIGAON PIN-783380 ASSA Advocate for the petitioner(s): X X Advocate for the respondent(s): B E F O R E HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH ORDER 02.05.2025 None appears on behalf of the petitioners on call. 2. It is seen that on the earlier occasion also, none had appeared on behalf of the petitioners. 3. It appears that the petitioners are not interested in the instant proceedings, for which, the revision petition stands dismissed for non-prosecution. JUDGE Comparing Assistant