HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 4840/2005 1. Ram Chandra S/o Ramdev Rager, aged 68 years, resident of Village Aluda, Tehsil and District Dausa. 2. Ram Karan S/o Puniram Meena, aged 40 years. 3. Prem Devi W/o Ram Karan, aged 35 years. 4. Pailat S/o Ram Karan aged 18 years. resident of Aluda, Tehsil and District Duasa. 5. Prabhati Lal S/o Ram Swaroop, aged 50 years. 6. Ram Singh S/o Ram Swaroop, aged 45 years. 7. Girraj S/o Ram Swaroop, aged 42 years. 8. Puniram S/o Ram Swaroop, aged 40 years. 9. Babu Lal S/o Ram Swaroop, aged 37 years. (From 5 to 9 all residents of Village Ganglas, Tehsil and District Dausa.) 10. Arjun Lal Bairwa S/o Nanagram Bairwa, aged 60 years, resident of Rajwas, Tehsil and District Dausa. 11. Harbhajan S/o Hazari, aged 70 years. 12. Gangadhar S/o Hazari, aged 65 years. 13. Bhagwan Sahay S/o Hazari, aged 60 years. (From 11 to 13 resident of Rajwas, Tehsil and District Dausa). 14. Smt. Uganti W/o Babu Lal Saini, aged 28 years. 15. Prabhu S/o Gopi Ram Khatik, aged 40 years. 16. Rajesh S/o Prabhu Saini, aged 30 years. (From 14 to 16 residents of Aluda, Tehsil and District Dausa). 17. Babu Lal S/o Shri Bhoma Bairwa, aged 35 years. 18. Rajendra Kumar Bairwa S/o Sh. Bhoma Bairwa, aged 30 years. 19. Budhram Bairwa S/o Bhoma Bairwa, aged 25 years. 20 Rukmani Bariwa W/o Sh. Babu Lal Bairwa, aged 30 years. (From 17 to 20 resident of Rajawas, Tehsil and District Dausa). 21. Ram Kishore S/o Narain Regar aged 45 years, resident of village Aluda, Tehsil and District Dausa. 22. Ladu S/o Sharwan Gurjar, aged 77 years. 23. Ram Singh S/o Sharwan Gurjar, aged 72 years. (From 22 to 23 residents of Ganglas, Tehsil and District Dausa). 24. Sita Ram S/o Kanhaiya Lal, aged 45 years, resident of Aluda, Tehsil and District Duasa, At present resident of J-48, Sharma Colony, 22 Gotam Nagar, Jaipur. 25. Krishna Kumar S/o Ram Narain, aged 38 years, resident of Aluda, Tehisl and District Dausa. At present resident S/o (2 of 4) [CW-4840/2005] Mohanpura, Tehsil Bassi, District Jaipur. 26. Bhajan Lal Meena S/o Gyarsi Lal, aged 38 years 27. Ramswaroop Meena S/o Gyarsi Lal, aged 35 years 28. Mitha Lal Meena S/o Gyarsi Lal, aged 32 years. 29. Gyarsi Lal Meena S/o Sh. Kishan Meena, aged 55 years. 30. Dholi Devi Meena W/o Bhajan Lal, aged 32 years. 31. Prabhati Devi W/o Jagdish, aged 38 years. 32. Kailash Meena S/o Mool Chand, aged 36 years. 33. Jayram Meena S/o Mool Chand, aged 32 years. 34. Ramesh Meena S/o Mool Chand, aged 30 years. (From 26 to 34 residents of Bandari, Tehsil and District Dausa) 35. Rukmani W/o Sita Ram Meena, aged 40 years. 36. Ganda Lal s/o Badri Lal Meena, aged 32 years. 37. Jayram S/o Badri Lal, Aged 30 years. 38. Moharpal S/o Badri Lal, aged 27 years. (From 35 to 38 resident of Thikariya Tehsil and District Dausa) 39. Mool Chand S/o Puniram, aged 45 years. 40. Kali W/o Mool Chand, aged 40 years. 41. Ram Awatar S/o Mool Chand aged 20 years. (From 39 to 41 residents of Aluda, Tehsil and District Dausa) 42. Sitaram S/o Madu Meena, aged 40 years. 43. Kamlesh S/o Madu Meena, aged 35 years. 44. Mukesh S/o Madu Meena, aged 25 years. 45. Murari S/o Madu Meena, aged 18 years. (From 42 to 45 residents of Aluda, Tehsil and District Dausa) ----Petitioners Versus 1. State of Rajasthan though the Secretary, Department of Revenue Government of Rajasthan, Jaipur. 2. Collector, Dausa. 3. Sub Divisional Officer, Duasa. 4. Tehsildar. Tehsil Dausa. 5. Smt. Pushpa Kumari, widow of Late Thakur Kishan Singh Ji, aged 83 years, resident of Village Aluda, Tehsil and District Dausa. 6. Thakur Hanumant Singh S/o Late Thakur Kishan Singh Ji, aged 61 years, resident of Village Aluda, Tehsil and District Dausa. 7. Rajendra Singh S/o Late Thakur Kishan Singh Ji, aged 56 years, resident of Village Aluda, Tehsil and District Dausa. ----Respondents (3 of 4) [CW-4840/2005] For Petitioner(s) : None For Respondent(s) : Mr. Neeraj Batra-GC Ms. Gunjan Chawla JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 09/07/2025 1. By way of filing this writ petition, a challenge has been led to the impugned order dated 24.03.2005 passed by the Sub Divisional Officer, Dausa (for short, ‘the SDO’) by which the proclamation order has been issued and objections have been invited from the interested persons. 2. In the considered opinion of this Court, such order passed by the SDO cannot be assailed before this Court by invoking the inherent jurisdiction of this Court contained under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. If at all the petitioners are aggrieved by the aforesaid order, they are at liberty to approach the appropriate forum of law for redressal of their grievance. In case, the petitioners wish to file an appropriate appeal/application against the aforesaid order, they can approach the authorities concerned within a period of one month from today. In case, such application/ appeal is filed within the above stipulated time, it is expected from the authorities concerned to decide the same expeditiously as early as possible within a period of three months, strictly in accordance with law, after providing due opportunity of hearing to all the respective parties. (4 of 4) [CW-4840/2005] 3. The interim order is operating in favour of the petitioners since 05.07.2005, the same would remain in currency till disposal of the said application/appeal. 4. The present writ petition stands disposed of, accordingly. Stay application and all pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Ashu/21