Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:22303 Court No. - 3 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 4244 of 2025 Petitioner :- Onkar Singh Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. Of Basic Education Lko. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Jitendra Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J. 1. Heard Sri Jitendra Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Pankaj Patel, learned Standing Counsel for the State- opposite party Nos.1, 2 and 3. 2. In view of the proposed order, the notice to opposite party No.4 is hereby dispensed with. 3. By means of this writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for the following relief:- "(i) to issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the opposite parties particularly opposite party No.2 to consider and appoint the petitioner on a suitable post under U.P. Recruitment of Dependants of Government Servants Dying-in-Harness Rules, 1974 at an early date." 4.Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that for redressal of his grievance, the petitioner has preferred a representation dated 21.03.2025 to the opposite party No.2, but no decision has been taken on the same till date. 5. Learned counsel for the petitioner has further submitted that the petitioner is ready to prefer a fresh representation to the Competent Authority, therefore, he may be permitted to prefer a fresh representation to the Competent Authority and direction may be issued him to consider and decide the said representation within a stipulated time. 6. Learned Standing Counsel has stated that he has no objection if direction is issued to the Competent Authority to consider and decide the representation of the petitioner within a stipulated time. 7. In view of the above, without entering into merits of the issue, the instant writ petition is being disposed of finally at the admission stage permitting the petitioner to prefer a fresh representation to the opposite party No.2 i.e. the Director, Basic Education, U.P., Nishatganj, Lucknow taking all pleas and grounds which are available with him annexing therewith copy of his earlier representation, if any, and the relevant documents in support of his claim within a period of fifteen days from today, and if any such representation is preferred by the petitioner within the aforesaid stipulated time, the authority concerned shall consider and decide the representation of the petitioner, strictly in accordance with law by passing a speaking and reasoned order, with expedition preferably within a period of ten weeks from the date of presentation of a certified copy of this order along along with representation and the decision thereof be intimated to the petitioner forthwith. 8. In view of the aforesaid terms, the instant writ petition is disposed of finally. . [Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J.] Order Date :- 21.4.2025 Suresh/ Digitally signed by :- SURESH CHANDRA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench