Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 134657 (MAD)

P.Venkatesh v. The Inspector of Police

CRL OP(MD)/7428/2025 · 2025-04-25

P Dhanabal

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Crl.O.P(MD)No.7428 of 2025 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 25.04.2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P. DHANABAL Crl.O.P(MD)No.7428 of 2025 P.Venkatesh, ... Petitioner Vs 1. The Inspector of Police, Suthamalli Police Station, Tirunelveli District. (Crime No.07 of 2025). 2. Nallathai ... Respondents PRAYER: Criminal Original petition has been filed under Section 528 of BNSS to call for the records relating to Crime No.7 of 2025, dated 03.01.2025 on the file of the first respondent police and to quash the same in so far as the petitioner. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Sathyachidambaram, For R1 : Mr.M.Vaikkam Karunanithi Government Advocate (Crl.Side) For R2 : Mr.M.Dinakar 1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P(MD)No.7428 of 2025 O R D E R This petition has been filed by the petitioner to call for the records pertaining to the First Information Report in Crime No.7 of 2025 dated 03.01.2025 on the file of the first respondent police, for the offences under Sections 329(4), 296(b), 131 and 351(3) of BNS and Section 4 of TNPHW Act and quash the same. 2. When the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned counsels on both sides represented that the matter has been amicably settled between the parties and to that effect, they have entered into a compromise and the same was filed before this Court. 3. The defacto-complainant and the accused are present and this Court enquired about the terms of compromise. The defacto-complainant represented that they entered into a compromise and she has no objection to quash the FIR. A compromise memo, dated 23.04.2025 signed by the parties and their respective counsel, is also filed before this Court. 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P(MD)No.7428 of 2025 4. This Court has perused the terms of the compromise memo. 5. Considering the nature of the offences and the parties have also entered into a compromise, it is appropriate to allow this petition. 6. Recording the said compromise memo, this petition is allowed and the First Information Report in Crime No.7 of 2025 dated 03.01.2025 on the file of the first respondent police is quashed. 25.04.2025 Internet:Yes Index :Yes/No NCC :Yes/No LR To 1. The Inspector of Police, Suthamalli Police Station, Tirunelveli District. 2.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. 3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P(MD)No.7428 of 2025 P. DHANABAL, J. LR Crl.O.P(MD)No.7428 of 2025 25.04.2025 4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis