Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 13464 (RAJ)

ARUN LAHOTI v. STATE BANK OF BIKANER AND JAIPUR

CW/3534/2005 · 2025-03-28

Mahendar Kumar Goyal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:14412] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 3534/2005 Arun Lahoti, Nidheshak, Anita Synthetics, R/o B-II 203, Kamal Apartment, Banipark Jaipur ----Petitioner Versus State Bank of Bikaner And Jaipur, Odhogik Vitt Shakha, Sansar Chandra Road, Jaipur through Sakha Prabhandhak ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : None present For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vikram Singh for Ms. Suruchi Kasliwal HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL Judgment / Order 28/03/2025 This writ petition was registered on a letter dated 28.03.2005 addressed to a Hon’ble Judge of this Court by Shri Arun Lahoti-the Proprietor, Anita Synthetics against the proceedings initiated by the respondent-Bank under the provisions of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Securities Interest Act, 2002 (hereinafter referred to as “the Act of 2002”). The applicant has an alternative efficacious remedy under Section 17 of the Act of 2002 against the action of the respondent-Bank. In view thereof, in the considered opinion of this Court, this writ petition is not maintainable. The same is dismissed accordingly. Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. (MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL),J Manish/40