Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:22330 Court No. - 3 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 4273 of 2025 Petitioner :- Bankey Lal Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Basic Edu. Lko And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Girish Kumar Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J. 1. Heard Sri Girish Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Ravi Swaroop Tiwari, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for opposite parties no. 1 an 2 and Sri Arun Kumar Singh holding brief of Sri Rishabh Tripathi, learned counsel for opposite parties no. 3 and 4. 2. By means of present writ petition, the petitioner has prayed the following main prayer:- " Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus thereby commanding and directing the opposite parties to regularize the services of the petitioner in the interest of justice." 3. Sri Pandey,learned counsel for the petitioner has drawn attention of this Court towards Annexure no.3, which is a judgment and order dated 20.12.2024 passed by the Apex Court in the case Jaggo Vs. Union of India and others arising out of SLP (C) No.5580 of 2024, making a request that the grievance of the petitioner may be redressed in the light of the aforesaid judgment as the same is applicable in the present case. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that for redressal of the aforesaid grievance, the petitioner may be permitted to prefer a fresh representation before opposite party no.3 and this Court may direct opposite party no.3 to pass an appropriate order in the light of judgment and order passed by the Apex Court in the case of Jaggo (supra) in accordance with law. 5. Learned counsel for the opposite parties have no objection if a direction for disposal of the representation is issued by this Court. 6. Therefore, without entering into merits of the issue, the petitioner is permitted to prefer a fresh representation to opposite party no. 3 i.e. Basic Shiksha Adhikari, District Sitapur taking all pleas and grounds, which are necessary for disposal of the representation, within a period of fifteen days from today. If such a representation is preferred by the petitioner within the aforesaid stipulated time, the authority concerned shall consider and dispose of the aforesaid representation of the petitioner by speaking and reasoned order and also in the light of dictum of Jaggo (Supra) verifying the applicability thereof in the present case strictly in accordance with law, with expedition, say within a period of two months from the date of receipt of the representation and thereafter communicate the decision thereof to the petitioner forthwith. 7. With the aforesaid direction, the writ petition is disposed of finally. Order Date :- 21.4.2025 Anurag Digitally signed by :- ANURAG SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench