C.Sudalaikannu @ Kannan v. The State of Tamilnadu Rep.by
CRL OP(MD)/7240/2025 · 2025-04-22
P Dhanabal
Transfer Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 134571 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 134571 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Crl.O.P(MD)No.7240 of 2025 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 22.04.2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P. DHANABAL Crl.O.P(MD)No.7240 of 2025 C.Sudalaikannu @ Kannan ... Petitioner Vs
1. The State of Tamilnadu Rep.By, The Superintendent of Police, Tirunelveli.
2. State of Tamilnadu Rep. By, The Inspector of Police, Sivanthipatti Police Station, Tirunelveli District.
3. Chandran ... Respondents PRAYER: Criminal Original petition has been filed under Section 528 of BNSS to direct the respondents No.2 and 3 not to harass the petitioner based on the petitioner's representation dated 15.04.2025. For Petitioner : Mr.M.Perumal For Respondents : Mr.M.Sakthi Kumar (R1-R2) Government Advocate (Crl.Side) 1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.O.P(MD)No.7240 of 2025
O R D E R This Criminal Original Petition has been filed to direct the respondents No.2 and 3 not to harass the petitioner based on the petitioner's representation dated 15.04.2025. 2.The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the respondent police harassed the petitioner by preventing him from entering into the village to see his family members. Therefore, he has sent a representation but the same has not been considered. Hence, this petition. 3.The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent police would submit that the petitioner has 9 previous cases and he is a history sheeted rowdy. In order to watch the movement of the petitioner, they have followed the petitioner. Apart from that they have not harassed the petitioner. 4.Considering the prayer sought for by the petitioner and the respondent police has denied the alleged harassment and they have only watched the movement of the petitioner, based on his previous 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.O.P(MD)No.7240 of 2025 antecedents and they have not harassed the petitioner, recording the submission of the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side), this petition is closed. 22.04.2025 Internet :Yes Index :Yes/No NCC :Yes/No PNM To 1.The Superintendent of Police, Tirunelveli. 2.The Inspector of Police, Sivanthipatti Police Station, Tirunelveli District. 3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.
3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.O.P(MD)No.7240 of 2025 P. DHANABAL, J. PNM
ORDER IN Crl.O.P(MD)No.7240 of 2025 22.04.2025 4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis