APHC010162792011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3330] FRIDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 30174/2011 Between: 1. P.VASANTHA KUMAR, BHIMAVARAM, S/O.ANANTA LAXMINARAYANA WORKING AS JUNIOR ASSISTANT AT SRI MAVULLAMMA AMMAVARI TEMPLE, BHIMAVARAM RESIDENT OF 24-6-2, H/O.SRI R.SUBBA RAYUDU,DASIKA STREET BHIMAVARAM ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE ASST COMMISSIONER ENDOWMENTS DEPT ANOTHER, RAJAHMUNDRY, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT 2. THE COMMISSIONER ENDOWMENTS DEPARTMENT, ANDHRA PRADESH, BOGGULAKUNTA, TILAK ROAD, HYDERABAD ...RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus by declaring the guidelines issued by the second respondent in U.O.Note in Rc.No.D2/751/2011 dated 10.2.2011 and the consequential proceedings issued in Rc.No.B1/98/2011 dated 29.7.2011 by the first respondent and fixation of seniority in the seniority list prepared on the even date by the first respondent, by counting the seniority of the petitioner from 1.5.1990 instead from 19.3.1982 as illegal, arbitrary, against the rules issued in G.O.Ms.No.1478 Revenue (Endts.VI) Department dated 17.11.1986 and set aside the same with a consequential direction to the respondents to count the seniority of the petitioner from 19.3.1982 in the category of Junior Assistant with all consequential benefits flow there from including grant of appropriate place in the seniority list and promotion etc. 2 IA NO: 1 OF 2011(WPMP 37387 OF 2011 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to count the seniority of the petitioner in the category of Junior Assistant from 19.3.1982 for giving appointment to the post of Executive officer Grade-III. Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. P V S S S RAMA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR ENDOWMENTS The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION NO. 30174 of 2011 ORDER: Despite the matter listed under the caption ‘for dismissal’, there is no representation for the petitioner. It evinces that the petitioner has no interest in prosecuting his case. Therefore, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous Petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________________________ JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO Date : 04.07.2025 SPP 4 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO Writ Petition No:30174 of 2011 Date : 04.07.2025 SPP