Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 134568 (ALL)

VISHAL SRIVASTAV v. BANK OF BARODA ZONAL INTERNAL AUDIT DIVISION LKO. THRU. COMPETENT AUTHORITY AND ANOTHER

WRIC/4398/2025 · 2025-05-15

Om Prakash Shukla, Rajan Roy

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:28477-DB Court No. - 2 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 4398 of 2025 Petitioner :- Vishal Srivastav Respondent :- Bank Of Baroda Zonal Internal Audit Division Lko. Thru. Competent Authority And Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Santosh Kr. Yadav Warsi,Deepesh Kumar Yadav,Viswash Counsel for Respondent :- Prashant Kumar Srivastava Hon'ble Rajan Roy,J. Hon'ble Om Prakash Shukla,J. Heard. The petitioner prays for following main relief:- "i) Issue a writ or order or direction in the nature of Writ of Mandamus commanding the opposite parties to send updated/revised data relating to credit card bearing no. 4293901003091003 issued from Bank of Baroda in the year 2006 to the Credit Information Bureau India Ltd. (CIBIL) so that credit report may be revised accordingly and credit worthiness of the petitioner's may be assessed correctly by the lender's agency." Why should a Writ Petition be filed for claiming such a relief ? There are other forums in this regard, which includes approaching the higher authorities of bank concerned or such other forums, as may be prescribed in law. The Writ Petition stands disposed of. (Om Prakash Shukla,J.) (Rajan Roy,J.) Order Date :- 15.5.2025 Saurabh Digitally signed by :- SAURABH VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench