Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 134567 (MAD)

Devadoss v. The State of Tamilnadu Rep.by

CRL OP(MD)/7239/2025 · 2025-04-22

P Dhanabal

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Crl.O.P(MD)No.7239 of 2025 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 22.04.2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P. DHANABAL Crl.O.P(MD)No.7239 of 2025 Devadoss ... Petitioner Vs 1. The State of Tamilnadu Rep.By, The Superintendent of Police, Sivagangai District, Sivagangai. 2. The Inspector of Police, Thirupattur Police Station, Sivagangai District. 3. Balasudaram ... Respondents PRAYER: Criminal Original petition has been filed under Section 528 of BNSS to direct the 1st respondent to instruct the 2nd respondent not to harass the petitioner and his family members under the guise of enquiry based on the petitioners representation dated 07.04.2025. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Rajamanickam For Respondents : Mr.M.Sakthi Kumar (R1-R2) Government Advocate (Crl.Side) 1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P(MD)No.7239 of 2025 O R D E R This Criminal Original Petition has been filed to direct the 1st respondent to instruct the 2nd respondent not to harass the petitioner and his family members under the guise of enquiry based on the petitioners representation dated 07.04.2025. 2.The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent police would submit that based on the complaint of the 3rd respondent, they have called the petitioner for enquiry and the same is pending. Apart from that they have not harassed the petitioner. 3.Considering the prayer of the petitioner, this Court is inclined to pass orders without issuing notice to the private respondent. 4.According to the petitioner, the second respondent harassed the petitioner under the guise of enquiry and the same is denied by the second respondent and only based on the complaint of the third respondent, they have called the petitioner for enquiry. 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P(MD)No.7239 of 2025 5.In view of the above, this Court hereby direct the second respondent to conduct enquiry and dispose of the representation of the petitioner within a period of one week from the date of this order, in accordance with law. 6.With the above observations and directions, this petition stands disposed of. 22.04.2025 Internet :Yes Index :Yes/No NCC :Yes/No PNM To The Superintendent of Police, Sivagangai District, Sivagangai. 2. The Inspector of Police, Thirupattur Police Station, Sivagangai District. 3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. 3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P(MD)No.7239 of 2025 P. DHANABAL, J. PNM ORDER IN Crl.O.P(MD)No.7239 of 2025 22.04.2025 4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis