SMT. ANARKALI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. U.P. LKO. AND ANOTHER
NABAIL/331/2025 · 2025-04-17
Subhash Vidyarthi
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 134557 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 134557 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:21632 Court No. - 15 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 331 of 2025 Applicant :- Smt. Anarkali Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. U.P. Lko. And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Dharmendra Bahadur Singh,Ajay Kumar Soni Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Subhash Vidyarthi,J.
1. Heard Shri Dharmendra Bahadur Singh, learned counsel for the applicant, Shri Jayant Singh Tomar, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the records.
2. The instant application has been filed seeking anticipatory bail for the applicant in Case Crime No.292 of 2024 under Sections 111, 318, 61(2), 351(2), 352 B.N.S. and 3/21 of The Banning of Unregulated Deposit Scheme Act 2019 registered at Police Station- Badosarai, District- Barabanki.
3. After advancing submissions at some length, the learned counsel for the applicant states that he does not want to press the instant application and the applicant would appear before the trial Court and file an application for her release on bail.
4. Accordingly, the present anticipatory bail application is hereby dismissed as not pressed.
5. However, in case the applicant appears before the trial Court and files an application for her release on bail, her bail application shall be considered and decided expeditiously in accordance with law without being influenced by rejection of her anticipatory bail application. . [Subhash Vidyarthi, J.] Order Date :- 17.4.2025 -Amit K- Digitally signed by :- AMIT KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench