Arulmigu Kallalagar Tirukoil v. Gopalakrishna Sankaran
WA(MD)/1756/2025 · 2025-07-02
G R Swaminathan, K Rajasekar
Transfer Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 134539 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 134539 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
W.A(MD)No.1756 of 2025 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 02.07.2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR W.A(MD)No.1756 of 2025 and C.M.P(MD)No.9843 of 2025 Arulmigu Kallalagar Thirukoil, Through its Deputy Commissioner / Executive Officer, Alagarkoil, Madurai District. ... Appellant /
3rd Respondent
Vs. 1.Gopalakrishnan Sankaran Represented through its Power Agent Shri Ka.Krishnan
... 1st Respondent / Writ Petitioner 2.The District Registrar, Office of the District Registrar, Madurai District, Madurai. 3.The Sub Registrar, Office of the Sub Registrar, Thallakulam, Madurai, Madurai District. 1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.A(MD)No.1756 of 2025 4.The Special Tahsildar, Temple Lands, Office of Assistant Commissioner, Madurai. 5.The Tahsildar, Office of the Tahsildar, Madurai North, Madurai District. ... Respondents 2 to 5 / Respondents 1, 2, 4 & 5 Prayer: Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent to set aside the
order dated 05.12.2023 passed in W.P(MD)No.27896 of 2023 on the file of this Court in respect of the impugned proceedings in Na.Ka.No.879/2021/A-1 dated 04.10.2023 of the appellant herein and thereby allow this Writ Appeal with costs. For Appellant : Mr.S.Manohar For Respondents : Mr.Mohammed Imran for R.1 Mr.S.Shaji Bino Special Government Pleader for R.2 to R.5
JUDGMENT (By G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J.) Heard both sides. 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.A(MD)No.1756 of 2025 2.The appellant temple filed O.S.No.367 of 1989 on the file of II Additional Sub Court, Madurai against the writ petitioner's vendor in respect of the subject property. The suit was dismissed on 24.07.1990. A.S(MD)No.327 of 1991 was filed by the appellant temple before the High Court was also dismissed on 08.07.2002. This judgment appears to have become final. Therefore, the writ petitioner need not get “No Objection Certificate” from the appellant temple for dealing with the subject property. That is why the learned single Judge allowed W.P(MD)No.27896 of 2023 filed by the first respondent herein. Interference with the said order is not warranted. 3.This Writ Appeal stands dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
[G.R.S., J.] [K.R.S., J.]
02.07.2025
NCC : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No Index : Yes / No MGA To 1.The District Registrar, Office of the District Registrar, Madurai District, Madurai. 3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.A(MD)No.1756 of 2025 G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J and
K.RAJASEKAR, J. MGA 2.The Sub Registrar, Office of the Sub Registrar, Thallakulam, Madurai, Madurai District. 3.The Special Tahsildar, Temple Lands, Office of Assistant Commissioner, Madurai. 4.The Tahsildar, Office of the Tahsildar, Madurai North, Madurai District.
W.A(MD)No.1756 of 2025 Copy to II Additional Sub Court, Madurai. 02.07.2025 4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis