SMT. SUBHADRA MAURYA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. , TRANSPORT LKO. AND 2 OTHERS
WRIA/4420/2025 · 2025-04-25
Rajesh Singh Chauhan
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 134500 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 134500 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:23673 Court No. - 3 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 4420 of 2025 Petitioner :- Smt. Subhadra Maurya Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. , Transport Lko. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Julfikar Ahmad,Mahmood Alam Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Ratnesh Chandra Hon'ble Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. By means of this writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for the following reliefs:-
"(i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the opposite parties concerned to provide theh family pension to the petitioner alongwith other admissible benefits in the interest of justice. (ii) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the opposite party concerned to consider and decide the application of the petitioner dated 20.03.202025 as contained in Annexure-1 to this writ petition in the interest of justice."
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that for redressal of his grievance, the petitioner has preferred representation dated 20.03.2025 (Annexure No.1) to the competent authority but to no avail. He has further submitted that the petitioner is ready to prefer a fresh representation to the Competent Authority, therefore, he may be permitted to prefer a fresh representation to the opposite party No.2 i.e., Managing Director, Uttar Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation, Lucknow and a direction may be issued to him to consider and decide the said representation of the petitioner with expedition. 4. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection if direction for disposal of the said representation is issued. 5.
Therefore, in view of the above, without entering into merits
of the issue, I hereby dispose of this petition finally at the admission stage giving liberty to the petitioner to prefer a fresh representation to the opposite party No.2 i.e., Managing Director, Uttar Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation, Lucknow ventilating her grievance taking all pleas and grounds which are available with her enclosing therewith the copy of her earlier representation, if any, which are necessary for disposal of the representation within a period of fifteen days from today and if such representation is preferred by the petitioner within the aforesaid stipulated time, the authority concerned shall consider and dispose of the same strictly, by speaking and reasoned order in accordance with law after affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, if it is so required, with expedition preferably, within a period of two months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order and the decision thereof shall be intimated to the petitioner forthwith. 6. This writ petition is disposed of, in view of the aforesaid terms. Order Date :- 25.4.2025 Reena/- (Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J.) Digitally signed by :- REENA KANNAUJIYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench