1 (RNT,J & BM,J CMA. NO.370 OF 2025) APHC010302612025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3572] WEDNESDAY,THE EIGHTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 370/2025 Between: 1. NODAGALA MOHANA NAGA BUCHI BABU, S/O.SATYAM AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, OCCGOVT.EMPLOYEE, R/O.KAPAVARAM VILLAGE, KORUKONDA MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...APPELLANT AND 1. NODAGALA PADMAVATHI, W/o.Mohana Naga Buchi Babu, Aged about 48 years, OccHousewife, R/o.D.No.5-2-26/C, 10TH Ward, Muralipet, Tadepalligudem, Tadepalligudem Mandal, West Godavari District ...RESPONDENT Appeal Under Section_____against ordersThis CMA Appeal is being preferred against the Orders dated 20.07.2018 in HMOP No. 118/2016 passed by the Honble Principal Senior Civil Judge, Machilipatnam, dismissing the H.M.O.P, for the following amongst other groundsT IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to condone the delay of838 in filing the appeal against the orders in HMOP No. 18/2016, dated 28.10.2022 and pass 2 (RNT,J & BM,J CMA. NO.370 OF 2025) Counsel for the Appellant: 1. B V ANJANEYULU Counsel for the Respondent: 1. The Court made the following : 3 (RNT,J & BM,J CMA. NO.370 OF 2025) JUDGMENT:-(per Hon’ble Sri Justice Ravi Nath Tilhari) This appeal has been filed by the appellant/husband being aggrieved from the dismissal of his divorce petition filed under Sections 13(1)(ia) and (ib) of the Hindu Marriage Act,1955, vide order, dated 28.10.2022, passed in H.M.O.P.No.18 of 2018 on the file of the learned Senior Civil Judge, Ramachandrapuram. 2. Pursuant to the order dated 03.09.2025, the parties were referred to the Mediation Centre of this Court for amicable resolution of the dispute. As per the mediation report dated 02.04.2026, vide ROC No.391/APHCMC/2026, the matter has been settled. 3. The mediation report dated 30.03.2026, which is annexed to the report of the Mediation Centre dated 02.04.2026, records that both the parties informed the mediator that they had settled their disputes before their elders and joined together to lead a marital life. A copy of the settlement deed was also annexed to the mediator’s report. 4. Sri B.V. Anjaneyulu, learned counsel for the appellant, submits that through the process of mediation, both the parties are now living together and requests that the present appeal be closed. 4 (RNT,J & BM,J CMA. NO.370 OF 2025) 5. Recording the aforesaid submission, the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is closed. Consequently, I.A. No.1 of 2025, seeking condonation of delay, is also closed. No order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall also stand closed. ____________________ RAVI NATH TILHARI, J ___________________ BALAJI MEDAMALLI,J Date :08.04.2026. RPD. 5 (RNT,J & BM,J CMA. NO.370 OF 2025) 47 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI (CLOSED) CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 370 of 2025 Date: 08.04.2026 RPD.