- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:3583 RFA No. 83 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 27TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 83 OF 2024 (INJ) BETWEEN: SMT. GEETHA BABU KRISHNAN W./O BABU KRISHNAN, AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS, REPRESENTED BY HER HUSBAND AND GPA HOLDER, SRI BABU KRISHNAN S/O LATE R.S.IYER, AGED ABOUT 73 YEARS, BOTH ARE R/O NO.27, 3RD CROSS, S.N.LAYOUT, BASAVESHWARANAGAR, BENGALURU - 560 079. …APPELLANT (BY SRI. VIJAYA KUMAR.K.O., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SRI MANJUNATH S/O NANJAPPA, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, R/AT NO.148, 7TH CROSS, SRINIVASANAGAR, SUNKADAKATTE, BENGALURU - 560 091. BENGALURU-560 067. 2. SRI L.SHANKERLAL MALI, S/O FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE 2ND PETITIONER, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, R/AT NO.1225, 6TH MAIN, Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:3583 RFA No. 83 of 2024 KAVERIPURA, KAMAKSHIPALYA, BENGALURU - 560 079. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. M.SHIVAPRAKASH., ADVOCATE FOR C/R2) THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96 OF CPC, 1908. THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL IS LISTED FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER Counsel for the appellant has appeared in person and sought time to comply with the office objections. This Court is not inclined to grant time. The reason is plain. As could be seen from the daily order sheet, the appeal was listed before Registrar (P & H) on several dates and sufficient time was granted to comply with the office objections. Again the appeal was listed on 13.01.2025, on that day, finally two weeks time was granted to comply with the office objections, failing which the office was directed to list the appeal under the caption ‘for dismissal of appeal for non- compliance of office objections’ on 27.01.2025. The appeal is listed today under the caption ‘for dismissal of appeal for non-compliance of office objections’. Despite - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:3583 RFA No. 83 of 2024 granting sufficient time, the appellant has not complied with the office objections. It appears that the appellant is not interested in prosecuting the appeal. In view of peremptory order dated 13.01.2025, the appeal is dismissed for non- compliance of office objections. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE MRP,TKN List No.: 1 Sl No.: 16