MEENA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT LKO AND 5 OTHERS
WRIA/4151/2025 · 2025-04-17
Rajesh Singh Chauhan
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 134442 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 134442 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:21844 Court No. - 3 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 4151 of 2025 Petitioner :- Meena Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Urban Development Lko And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ajay Bahadur Yadav Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Ramesh Chandra Pandey Hon'ble Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J. Heard Sri Ajay Bahadur Yadav, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Brijendra Singh, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for opposite party nos. 1 and 2 and Sri R.C. Pancey, who has appeared on behalf of opposite party nos. 3, 5 and 6. By means of this petition, the petitioner has prayed the following relief:-
"i- Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the opp. Parties particularly opp. parties to provide the benefits of retiral dues (i.e. gratuity, leave encashment, provident funds saving etc) to late husband of the petitioner namely Vijay who has superannuated on 30-06- 2017 later on died on 09.10.2018 but till date the benefit of retiral dues has not been given to the petitioner."
Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is ready to prefer a fresh representation to the Competent Authority, therefore, he may be permitted to prefer a fresh representation to the opposite party No.5 i.e., Executive Engineer Nagar Palika Parishad District Raibareli and a direction may be issued to him to consider and decide the said representation of the petitioner with expedition. Learned Standing Counsel and the learned counsel for the opposite party have no objection if direction for disposal of the said representation is issued. Therefore, in view of the above, without entering into merits of the issue, I hereby dispose of this petition finally at the admission stage giving liberty to the petitioner to prefer a fresh representation to the opposite party No.5 i.e., Executive Engineer Nagar Palika Parishad District Raibareli ventilating his grievance taking all pleas and grounds which are available with him enclosing therewith the copy of his earlier representation, if any, which are necessary for disposal of the
representation within a period of fifteen days from today and if such representation is preferred by the petitioner within the aforesaid stipulated time, the authority concerned shall consider and dispose of the same strictly, by speaking and reasoned order in accordance with law after affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, if it is so required, with expedition preferably, within a period of two months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order and the decision thereof shall be intimated to the petitioner forthwith. This writ petition is disposed of, in view of the aforesaid terms.
Order Date :- 17.4.2025 Anurag Digitally signed by :- ANURAG SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench