Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:21636-DB Court No. - 2 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 3641 of 2025 Petitioner :- Rakesh Kumar Mishra Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. District Magistrate District Sultanpur And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Manmohan Singh,Sandeep Kumar Ojha Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Rajan Roy,J. Hon'ble Om Prakash Shukla,J. Heard. The petitioner claims to have his vehicle financed from the opposite party no. 2 i.e. Mahindra & Mahindra Finance Limited. It is alleged that the vehicle has been repossessed by the said Finance Company, hence this petition. We fail to understand as to how a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is maintainable. The matter arises out of contracts. If any offence has been committed, then the remedy is by way of filing of an F.I.R. or complaint, as per the criminal law. The writ petition is disposed of with the aforesaid liberty, if there is a cause. Order Date :- 17.4.2025 Lokesh Kumar [Om Prakash Shukla, J.] [Rajan Roy, J.] Digitally signed by :- LOKESH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench