Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 13440 (UTT)

RAJIV TYAGI v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPCRL/1380/2024 · 2025-07-08

Pankaj Purohit

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS WPCRL No.1380 of 2024 Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J. Ms. Suraiya Naaz, Advocate for the petitioners. 2. Mr. S.S. Chauhan, D.A.G. with Mr. Vikash Uniyal, B.H. for the State. 3. Learned State counsel, on instructions, which are taken on record, submitted that after investigation a final report dated 04.03.2025 has been submitted in favour of the petitioners, which is not disputed by counsel for the petitioners. 4. In view of the submission made by counsel for the parties, nothing remains to be decided in the present writ petition. 5. Accordingly, writ petition is closed. (Pankaj Purohit, J.) 08.07.2025 SK