Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 134360 (ALL)

USHA TIWARI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. THE PRIN. SECY. REVENUE LKO. AND OTHERS

CRLP/4759/2025 · 2025-06-05

Rajesh Singh Chauhan, Ram Manohar Narayan Mishra

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:34663-DB Court No. - 9 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 4759 of 2025 Petitioner :- Usha Tiwari Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. The Prin. Secy. Revenue Lko. And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Durgendra Kumar Tiwari Counsel for Respondent :- G.A. Hon'ble Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J. Hon'ble Ram Manohar Narayan Mishra,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned A.G.A. appearing on behalf of the State. 2. The petitioner is aggrieved by non-lodging of her first information report. 3. Ordinarily a remedy under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C./ 175(3) B.N.S.S. is there but the question is as to why the first information report has not been lodged specially in view of the decision of Hon'ble the Apex Court in the case of Lalita Kumari Vs. Government of Uttar Pradesh and others; AIR 2014 SC 187. 4. In view of above, writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the Commissioner of Police, Lucknow to look into the matter on a representation to be submitted by the petitioner within ten days from today in the light of the aforesaid decision and take appropriate action. If the petitioner is aggrieved any further, she may avail the remedies prescribed in law, such as under Section 156(3) of Cr.P.C./ 175(3) of B.N.S.S. [Ram Manohar Narayan Mishra,J.] [Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J.] Order Date :- 5.6.2025 Mohd. Sharif Digitally signed by :- MOHAMMAD SHARIF High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench