Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 134340 (ALL)

DR. VINAY PRAKASH SRIVASTAVA v. COMMISSIONER AYODHYA DIVISION AYODHYA/PRESIDENT AYODHYA DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AND OTHERS

WRIC/3623/2025 · 2025-04-17

Om Prakash Shukla, Rajan Roy

Civil Appealbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:21606-DB Court No. - 2 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 3623 of 2025 Petitioner :- Dr. Vinay Prakash Srivastava Respondent :- Commissioner Ayodhya Division Ayodhya/President Ayodhya Development Authority And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Mohammad Ehtesham Khan,Shashi Kant Mishra Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Pankaj Patel Hon'ble Rajan Roy,J. Hon'ble Om Prakash Shukla,J. 1. Heard. 2. Sri Pankaj Patel, learned counsel for Ayodhya Development Authority says that the temporary injunction granted by the district court on 24.02.2018 in Misc. Civil Appeal No.56/2017 (Computer Registration No.55/2017) is not being violated and shall not be violated. He says that in fact it is the petitioner who is interfering in the land of the authority. 3. If the petitioner has any grievance, he can seek remedies before the trial court where the suit proceedings are still pending. 4. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of. (Om Prakash Shukla,J.) (Rajan Roy,J.) Order Date :- 17.4.2025 Shanu/- Digitally signed by :- SHANU SUMAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench