OSMAN GANI AND 9 ORS v. THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 2 ORS
WP(C)/437/2025 · 2025-02-06
Suman Shyam
Writ Petition (Civil)body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 13433 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 13433 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010116792024
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/437/2025 OSMAN GANI AND 9 ORS S/O- PANA ULLAH, VILLAGE- ANANDA PUR, P.O- MAJGAON, DIST-BAJALI 2: ZAKIR HUSSAIN S/O- LATE NAZZESH ALI
VILL- ANANDAPUR P.O- MAJGAON DIST- BAJALI 3: MALOTI BALA BORO C/O- GAJENDRA NATH BARO
VILL- GOMURA P.O- BHALAGURI DIST- BAJALI 4: ABDUL KASHEM AHMED S/O- LATE MUNTAZ ALI
VILL- DALOR PATHAR P.O- B.D PATHAR DIST- BAJALI 5: SADEQUE ALI AHMED S/O- LATE MUNTAZ ALI
VILL- CHARAIPARA P.O- BHOWKAMARI DIST- BAJALI 6: MD. CHAN MIAH
Page No.# 2/3 S/O- LATE MAJAM ALI
VILL- MAJGAON P.O- MAJGAON DIST- BAJALI 7: ABDUL KADER S/O- ABDUR RAHMAN
VILL- ANANDAPUR P.O- MAJGAON DIST- BAJALI 8: MAZIBAR RAHMAN S/O- LATE JARU MIAH
VILL- SUKMANAH P.O- SUKMANAH DIST- BAJALI 9: RANDHIR CH. DEY S/O- LATE JAGANNATH CHANDRA DEY
VILL- PANPARA P.O- RUPALI DIST- BAJALI 10: BHABESH KALITA S/O- LATE NARAKANTA KALITA
VILL- MAHARANI P.O- BAGMARA BAZAR DIST- BAJAL VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 2 ORS REP. BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM, ELEMENTARY EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, DISPUR, GUWAHATI-06 2:THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM FINANCE DEPARTMENT DISPUR GUWAHATI-06 3:THE DIRECTOR OF ELEMENTARY EDUCATION KAHILIPARA
Page No.# 3/3 ASSAM GUWAHATI-1 Advocate for the Petitioner : ANACLATAS AHMED, MR. M P SARMA Advocate for the Respondent : SC, FINANCE, SC, ELEM. EDU
BEFORE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUMAN SHYAM
ORDER Date : 07/02/2025 Vijay Bishnoi, CJ
Heard Mr. Anaclatas Ahmed, learned counsel for the writ petitioners. We have also heard Mr. R. Mazumar, learned Standing Counsel, Education Department, Assam, appearing for the respondents.
Learned counsel appearing for the parties are in agreement that the controversy involved in this writ petition is squarely covered by the judgment dated 04.10.2024, rendered by this Court in WP(C) 2729/2019. It is also submitted that a Division Bench of this Court has already disposed of another identical writ petition, being WP(C) 4265/2023, in terms of the order dated 04.10.2024 passed by the Division Bench this Court in WP(C) 2729/2019. In view of the above submission of the learned counsel for the parties, this writ petition is
disposed of in terms of the judgment dated 04.10.2024 passed by the Division Bench of this Court in WP(C) 2729/2019.
JUDGE CHIEF JUSTICE
sukhamay Comparing Assistant