Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 13433 (GAU)

OSMAN GANI AND 9 ORS v. THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 2 ORS

WP(C)/437/2025 · 2025-02-06

Suman Shyam

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010116792024 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/437/2025 OSMAN GANI AND 9 ORS S/O- PANA ULLAH, VILLAGE- ANANDA PUR, P.O- MAJGAON, DIST-BAJALI 2: ZAKIR HUSSAIN S/O- LATE NAZZESH ALI VILL- ANANDAPUR P.O- MAJGAON DIST- BAJALI 3: MALOTI BALA BORO C/O- GAJENDRA NATH BARO VILL- GOMURA P.O- BHALAGURI DIST- BAJALI 4: ABDUL KASHEM AHMED S/O- LATE MUNTAZ ALI VILL- DALOR PATHAR P.O- B.D PATHAR DIST- BAJALI 5: SADEQUE ALI AHMED S/O- LATE MUNTAZ ALI VILL- CHARAIPARA P.O- BHOWKAMARI DIST- BAJALI 6: MD. CHAN MIAH Page No.# 2/3 S/O- LATE MAJAM ALI VILL- MAJGAON P.O- MAJGAON DIST- BAJALI 7: ABDUL KADER S/O- ABDUR RAHMAN VILL- ANANDAPUR P.O- MAJGAON DIST- BAJALI 8: MAZIBAR RAHMAN S/O- LATE JARU MIAH VILL- SUKMANAH P.O- SUKMANAH DIST- BAJALI 9: RANDHIR CH. DEY S/O- LATE JAGANNATH CHANDRA DEY VILL- PANPARA P.O- RUPALI DIST- BAJALI 10: BHABESH KALITA S/O- LATE NARAKANTA KALITA VILL- MAHARANI P.O- BAGMARA BAZAR DIST- BAJAL VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 2 ORS REP. BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM, ELEMENTARY EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, DISPUR, GUWAHATI-06 2:THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM FINANCE DEPARTMENT DISPUR GUWAHATI-06 3:THE DIRECTOR OF ELEMENTARY EDUCATION KAHILIPARA Page No.# 3/3 ASSAM GUWAHATI-1 Advocate for the Petitioner : ANACLATAS AHMED, MR. M P SARMA Advocate for the Respondent : SC, FINANCE, SC, ELEM. EDU BEFORE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUMAN SHYAM ORDER Date : 07/02/2025 Vijay Bishnoi, CJ Heard Mr. Anaclatas Ahmed, learned counsel for the writ petitioners. We have also heard Mr. R. Mazumar, learned Standing Counsel, Education Department, Assam, appearing for the respondents. Learned counsel appearing for the parties are in agreement that the controversy involved in this writ petition is squarely covered by the judgment dated 04.10.2024, rendered by this Court in WP(C) 2729/2019. It is also submitted that a Division Bench of this Court has already disposed of another identical writ petition, being WP(C) 4265/2023, in terms of the order dated 04.10.2024 passed by the Division Bench this Court in WP(C) 2729/2019. In view of the above submission of the learned counsel for the parties, this writ petition is disposed of in terms of the judgment dated 04.10.2024 passed by the Division Bench of this Court in WP(C) 2729/2019. JUDGE CHIEF JUSTICE sukhamay Comparing Assistant