SURAJ NARAYAN GUPTA v. THE STATE OF U.P. THRU. ITS ADDL. CHIEF SECY./PRIN. SECY./SPECIAL DEPTT. OF SPORTS AND 2 OTHERS
WRIA/4121/2025 · 2025-04-17
Rajesh Singh Chauhan
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 134317 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 134317 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:21597 Court No. - 3 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 4121 of 2025 Petitioner :- Suraj Narayan Gupta Respondent :- The State Of U.P. Thru. Its Addl. Chief Secy./Prin. Secy./Special Deptt. Of Sports And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Archana Rawat,Rahul Kumar Kaushal Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Ashutosh Shahi Hon'ble Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J.
1. Heard Ms. Archana Rawat, learned counsel for the petitioner, Shri Brajendra Singh, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State-respondent and Shri Ashutosh Shahi, learned counsel for the opposite party Nos.2 & 3.
2. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner has requested that the petitioner may be given liberty to prefer representation to the opposite party No.3 and the same may be decided, strictly in accordance with law and policy.
3. Though Shri Ashutosh Shahi, learned counsel for the opposite party Nos.2 and 3 has stated that the grievance so raised by the petitioner in this writ petition is misconceived, but so far as the disposal of the representation is concerned, he has no objection.
4. Therefore, without entering into merits of the issue, the instant writ petition is being disposed of finally at the admission stage giving liberty to the petitioner to prefer a fresh representation to the opposite party No.3 i.e. the Principal, Guru Govind Singh U.P. Sports College, Gudamba, Kurshi Road, Lucknow taking all pleas and grounds which are available with him annexing therewith copy of his earlier representation, if any, and the relevant documents in support of his claim within a period of fifteen days from today, and if any such representation is preferred by the petitioner within the aforesaid stipulated time, the authority concerned shall consider and decide the representation of the petitioner, strictly in accordance with law by passing a speaking and reasoned order, with expedition preferably within a period of three months from the date of presentation of a certified copy of this order along with representation and the decision thereof be intimated to the petitioner forthwith.
5. In view of the aforesaid terms, the instant writ petition is
disposed of finally. [Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J.]
Order Date :- 17.4.2025 Suresh/ Digitally signed by :- SURESH CHANDRA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench