Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 13429 (AP)

Anusuri Veeranna Raju, v. Datla Srinivasa Raju,

CRP/907/2025 · 2025-05-08

B Krishna Mohan

Original Suitbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI FRIDAY ,THE NINTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 906. 907. 929 & 954 OF 2025 CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 906 OF 2025 Petition filed under 115 of C.P.C, aggrieved by the order passed by the I Addl. Civil Judge (Senior Division), Kakinada in E.A.42/2024 in E.P.53/2022 in O.S.432/2017 dated. 12.03.2025 Between: 1. Anusuri Veeranna Raju, S/o.Subbarao, aged about 32 Cultivation, R/o.D.No.2-60, Vemulawada, Karapa Mandal District. years Occ. , Kakinada ...PETITIONER/RESPONDENT/DEFENDANT AND 1. Datia Srinivasa Raju, S/o.Venkata Subbaraju, Aged about 46 R/o.D.No.11-58 Vemulawada, Karapa Mandal, Kakinada District. years. ...RESPONDENTS/PETITIONER/PLAINTIFF lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition pleased to suspend the orders passed in E.A.No.42 of 2024 in E.P.No.53 praying that in the circumstances the High Court may be of 2022 in O.S.No.432 of 2017 dated 12.03.2025 pending disposal of the Revision petition CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 907 OF 2025 Petition filed under 115 of C.P.C, aggrieved by the order passed by the I Addl. Civil Judge (Senior Division), Kakinada in E.A.251/2022 in E.P.53/2022 in O.S.432/2017 dated. 12.03.2025 Between; 1. Anusuri Veeranna Raju, S/o.Subbarao, aged about 32 years Occ Cultivation, R/o.D.No.2-60, Vemulawada, Karapa Mandal Kakinada District. ...PETITIONER/RESPONDENT/DEFENDANT AND 1. Datia Srinivasa Raju, S/o.Venkata Subbaraju Aged about 46 years, R/o.D.No.11-58 Vemulawada, Karapa Mandal, Kakinada District. ...RESPONDENTS/PETITIONER/PLAINTIFF lA NO; 1 OF 2Q2fi Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the orders passed in E.A.No.251 of 20222 in E.P.No.53 of 2022 in O.S.No.432 of 2017 dated 12.03.2025 pending disposal of the Revision petition CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 929 OF 2025 Petition filed under 115 of C.P.C, aggrieved by the order passed by the I Addl. Civil Judge (Senior Division), Kakinada in E.A.252/2022 in E.P.53/2022 in O.S.432/2017 dated, other grounds 12.03.2025 for the following among Between: 1. Anusuri Veeranna Raju, S/o.Subbarao, aged about Cultivation, R/o.D.No.2-60, Vemulawada, Karapa Mandal, Kakinada District. 32 years Occ ...PETITIONER/RESPONDENT/JUDGMENT DEBTOR/DEFENDANT AND 1. Datia Srinivasa Raju, S/o.Venkata Subbaraju, Aged about 46 years R/o.D.No.11-58, Vemulawada, Karapa Mandal, Kakinada District. ...RESPONDENTSPETTIONER/DECREE HOLDER/PLAINTIFF lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the orders passed in E.A.No.252/2022 in E.P.No.53 of 2022 in O.S.No.432 of 2017 dated 12.03.2025 pending disposal of the Revision petition CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 954 OF 202fi Petition filed under 115 of C.P.C aggrieved by the order passed by the I Addl. Civil Judge (Senior Division), Kakinada in E.A. 154/2023 in E.P.53/2022 in O.S.432/2017 dated.12.03.2025 Between: 1. Anusuri Veeranna Raju, S/o.Subbarao Cultivation, R/o.D.No.2-60, Vemulawada, Karapa Mandal, Kakinada District aged about 32 years, Occ ...PETITIONER/RESPONDENT/DECREE HOLDER/DEFENDANT AND 1. Datia Srinivasa Raju, S/o.Venkata Subbaraju, Aged about 46 years, R/o.D.No.11-58, Vemulawada, Karapa Mandal, Kakinada District. ...RESPONDENTS/PETITIONER/JUDGMENT DEBTOR/PLAINTIFF lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the orders passed in E.A.No.154 of 2023 in E.P.No.53 of 2022 in O.S.No.432 of 2017 dated 12.03.2025 pending disposal of the Revision petition Counsel for the Petitioners in all cases : SRI C SUBODH Counsel for the Respondents in all cases: SRI M R S SRINIVAS The Court made the following COMMON ORDER : f APHC010161672025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3233] rA*"-! FRIDAY ,THE NINTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN CIVIL REVISION PETITION Nos.906. 907, 929 and 954 of 2025 Between: Anusuri Veeranna Raju ...PETITIONER AND Datia Srinivasa Raju ...RESPONDENT Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.CSUBODH Counsel for the Respondent: 1.M RS SRINIVAS 2 HBKM,J C.R.P.Nos.906, 907, 929 & 954 of 2025 The Court made the following: COMMON ORDER: (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice B. Krishna Mohan) Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for 1 the respondent. The learned counsel for the petitioner filed memo commonly in all the above said C.R.Ps, dated 09.04.2025 seeking permission to vacate the E.P. schedule property within a period of six months. For which, the learned counsel for the respondent filed objections dated 17.04.2025 stating that the petitioner is only adopting delaying tactics when the duration of the crop itself is 120 days. It is nothing but an attempt to postpone the delivery of 2. possession. 3. In view of the above said facts and circumstances, the petitioner is directed to vacate the E.P. schedule property within a period of three months from today. No further extension will be considered. Unconditionally the petitioner shall vacate before the expiry of the said period of three (03) months. The petitioner shall file an undertaking affidavit before the Executing Court enclosing this order copy. If there are any arrears over the E.P. schedule property, the same shall be cleared by the petitioner before vacation of the subject land within two (02) months from today. 3 HBKM,J C. R. P. Nos. 906, 907, 929 & 954 of 2025 '■ 4. Accordingly, theseCivil Revision Petitions aredisposed of. There shall 1 i be no order as to costs. As a sequel, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, shall stand SD/- M.SRINIVAS ASSISTANT REGISTRAR closed. //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To 1. The I Addl. Civil Judge (Senior Division), Kakinada 2. One CC to SRI. C SUBODH, Advocate [OPUC] 3. One CC to SRI. MRS SRINIVAS, Advocate [OPUC] 4. The Section Officer, VR Section, High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravathi 5. Three CD Copies Sm TAC HIGH COURT DATED:09/05/2025 i COMMON ORDER CRP.No.906, 907, 929 & 954 of 2025 DISPOSING OF THE CIVIL REVISION PETITIONS