Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:23683 Court No. - 6 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 3590 of 2025 Petitioner :- Bhola Aajivika Swyam Sahayta Samooh Thru. Its Treasurar Smt. Reeta Arya Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Rural Development,Lko. And 7 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Dinesh Kumar Ojha Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Pankaj Gupta Hon'ble Pankaj Bhatia,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the State and Shri Pankaj Gupta, learned counsel for respondent no.8. 2. Present petition has been filed alleging that the petitioner being found eligible was called for for verification of the documents which according to the petitioner was submitted, however, the same were to be wanting in certain respect and ultimately an order came to be passed on 02.04.2025 directing that a fresh meeting be called for election of a person entitled to be appointed as a fair price shop dealer. 3. Contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that the reasonings recorded for non-suiting the petitioner are wholly arbitrary and contrary to the record. 4. On the basis of the said, instructions have been produced by learned Standing Counsel. 5. Considering the fact that in the first round it was only the petitioner who had participated, although, prima-facie, the reasonsings recorded for non-suiting the petitioner are not justified, however, considering the fact that a fresh meeting has already been called, I do not see any reason to interfere in exercise of powers under Art. 226 of the Constitution. 6. However, it is clarified that the petitioner would be entitled to participate in the meeting directed to be held in pursuance to the order dated 02.04.2025 and the petitioner will not be denied the right to participate solely on the reasoning that the petitioner is not eligible for participation. 7. Present petition stands disposed off in above terms. Order Date :- 25.4.2025 nishant Digitally signed by :- NISHANT MOHAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench