APHC010162062020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] TUESDAY, THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION No. 10112/2020 Between: 1. KASAVARAJU SANKARALOVA JAGANMOHAN RAO,, S/O. SATYANARAYANA, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS, R/O. KONKASINGI VILLAGE, GOLUGONDA MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT, A.P. 2. KASAVARAJU SATYANARAYANA,, S/O. LATE LOVA RAJU, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, ADVOCATE, R/O. KONKASINGI VILLAGE, GOLUGONDA MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT, A.P. 3. KASAVARAJU SURYA PRABHAVATHI,, W/O. SATYANARAYANA, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, HOUSEWIFE, R/O. KONKASINGI VILLAGE, GOLUGONDA(M), VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT, A.P. 4. BOBBARA VENKATA VIJAYA JHANSI LAKSHMI,, W/O. VENKATA SIMHACHALAM, 33 YEARS, HOUSEWIFE, R/O. V.B.AGRAHARAM, NATHAVARAM MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT, A.P. 5. BOBBARA VENKATA SIMHACHALAM,, S/O. VENKATARAMANA, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, R/O. V.B.AGRAHARAM, NATHAVARAM MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT, A.P. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, A.P. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT, VISAKHAPATNAM, A.P, 3. THE ASSISTANT SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, VISAKHAPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT, A.P. 4. THE SUBINSPECTOR OF POLICE, PAYAKRAOPETA POLICE STATION, PAYAKRAOPET, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT, A.P. 5. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, PAYAKRAOPETA POLICE STATION, PAYAKRAOPETA, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT, A.P. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. K SUBRAHMANYAM 2 Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “.... a Writ of Mandamus declaring the in action of the 4th respondent in detaining the petitioners in Payakraopeta Police Station without any registering FIR or any notice serving on us is bad, illegal, arbitrary under Article 21 of the Constitution of India.” 2. Sri V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home would submit that Police are not calling the Petitioners to the Police Station. 3. Sri K.Subrahmanyam, learned counsel for the Petitioners would submit that, recording the same, the petition may be disposed of. 4. Considering the submissions made, the Writ Petition is disposed of directing the Police not to call the Petitioners, in the absence of any crime registered against them. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:16.09.2025 Dinesh 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.10112 of 2020 Dt.16.09.2025 Dinesh