Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 134237 (PNJ)

RAM RATI v. SUMAN SETHI

RSA/343/2013 · 2025-11-19

Nidhi Gupta

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN TH 220-I Ram Rati Suman Set CORAM: Present:- NIDHI GU way of the and decree Gurgaon. B judgment Additional at the stage N.D. Achin and the Reg however, th RSA-343-2013 (O & M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJA AT CHANDIGAR Regular Second Appeal No.34 Date of decision :-19.11.2025 Rati Versus an Sethi AM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NI None for the appellant. Mr. Sanjay Vij, Advocate for t HI GUPTA J. (Oral) The appellant/defendant has of the present Regular Second Appea decree dated 03.08.2012 passed by t aon. By the said judgment, the first a ment and decree dated 09.01.2012 tional Civil Judge (Senior Division), G The appeal pertains to the yea e stage of arguments. Vide last order dated 04.3.202 Achint, Advocate learned counsel fo he Registry was directed to issue notic As per office report, the ap ever, there is no representation on her 1 UNJAB AND HARYANA IGARH No.343 of 2013 (O & M) .2025 …..Appellant …..Respondent E NIDHI GUPTA te for the respondent. t has approached this Court by Appeal challenging the judgment d by the learned District Judge, first appellate Court set aside the 1.2012 passed by the learned ion), Gurgaon. he year 2013 and is still lingering .3.2025 it was informed that Mr. sel for the appellant has expired e notice to the appellant. the appellant has been served, her behalf. VIJAY ASIJA 2025.11.21 15.16 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document appellant pendency o than 12 yea no attempt a new coun the instant an appropr for reviving November Vijay Asija Whether spea Whether Repo RSA-343-2013 (O & M) In the aforesaid premise, issua would be a futile exercise. It app ency of the present appeal before this years, the appellant has lost interes ttempt has been made by her to contac counsel. Be that as it may, in view of th nstant appeal is disposed of, with liber ppropriate application within a period eviving the same, if so, advised. Copy of this order be sent to th Pending application(s), if any, ember 19, 2025 r speaking/reasoned Yes / No r Reportable Yes / No 2 e, issuance of fresh notice to the It appears that due to sheer long e this Court for a period of more interest in pursuing the same, as contact her counsel or to engage w of the foregoing circumstances, h liberty to the appellant, to move period of 02 months from today nt to the appellant. if any, shall stands disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE VIJAY ASIJA 2025.11.21 15.16 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document