SHITALA PRASAD v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. REVENUE, CIVIL SECTT. LKO. AND OTHERS
WRIC/3592/2025 · 2025-04-17
Om Prakash Shukla, Rajan Roy
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 134235 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 134235 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:21523-DB Court No. - 2 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 3592 of 2025 Petitioner :- Shitala Prasad Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue, Civil Sectt. Lko. And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Vaibhav Shukla Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Rajan Roy,J. Hon'ble Om Prakash Shukla,J.
1. Heard.
2. The petitioner has some grievance against the private opposite parties. A writ petition is not the remedy. The petitioner may avail other remedies as may be permissible in law.
3. With the aforesaid observations, the writ petition is disposed of. (Om Prakash Shukla, J.) (Rajan Roy, J.) Order Date :- 17.4.2025 -Piyush- Digitally signed by :- PIYUSH YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- PIYUSH YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench