IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AM^RAVATI ^ (Special Original Jurisdiction) a FRIDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF MARCH \/ /j TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE O' a. o iSf'y A. PRESENT HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR AND ^ THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 8273 OF 2025 Between; Chitta Anil Kumar, S/o. Ramireddy, Aged about 44 years, Occ; Business, R/o. Flat No. 201, Sujay Srinivasam Apartments, Beside D-Mart, Nizampet Main Road, Hyderabad, Telangana State. ...PETITIONER AND 1. Union of India, Represented by its Secretary (Finance), New Delhi. 2. Shriram Finance Limited, Represented by its Managing Director, Office of Level-Ill, Wockhardt Towers, East Wing, C-2 Block, Bandra Kurla Complex, Mumbai -400051. 3. The Authorized officer, Shriram Finance Ltd., Near Nellore Bus stand Varaprasad Complex Ongole Town, Prakasam District. ^ ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 2^6 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ or order more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus or an appropriate writ or order declaring the E-mail communication dated 16.03.2025 sent by the 3'^'^ respondent informing the Petitioner that the E-Auction Notice dated 04.0^^025 pursuant to which E- Auction schedule to be held on 12.03.2025 was withdrawn, after issuance of the confirmation letter dt. 13- 03-2025, without assigning any valid reasons, as illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional and consequently permit the Petitioner to pay the balance bid amount of Rs. 3,22,12,500/- with a mm direction to the 3rd Petitioner. respondent to issue the sale certificate in favour of the' jA NO: 1 OF Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed i pleased to in support of the petition. the 3rd re ^ communication dated 16.0:^025*'^^^^^ the 3rd respondent mforming ,he Petitioner 04.02.2025 sent by dated that the Auction Notice pursuant to which E-Auction schedule to be held 12.03.2025 disposal of the writ petitiohT^ on was withdrawn without assigning any valid reasons pending jA NO: 2 OF 7noK Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances j the High Court may be bid amount of stated in the affidavit filed i pleased to in support of the petition. direct the 3 Rs. 3.22.12.500/- respondent to receive the balance pursuant to the Auction confirmation letter dated in favor of the Petitioner. 12.03.2025 and i disposal of the writ petition. issue the sale certificate i pending Counsel for the Petitioner : Counsel for the Respondent : SRI KOTI REDDY IDAMAKANTI No.1 ; SRI P. PONNA RAO. DEPUTY SOLICITOR GENERAL OF INQI^ Counsel for the Respondent The Court made the following: ORDER Nos.2 & 3 : NONE APPEARED ^ APHC010161972025 COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI Bench Sr.No:-5 [3483] WRIT PETITION NO: 8273 of 2025 Chitta Anil Kumar ...Petitioner Vs. Union of India and others ...Respondents ********** Advocate for Petitioner Mr. Koti Reddy Idamakanti Advocate for Respondents CORAM :THE CHIEF JUSTICE DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI DATE : 28^*^ March, 2025 PC : In view of the availability of an equally efficacious alternative remedy before the Debts Recovery Tribunal, we do not find it a fit case to invoke our extra-ordinary writ jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, considering the ratio of the judgments of the Apex Court in Radha Krishan Industries v. State of Himachal Pradesh [(2021) 6 SCC 771] and United Bank of India v. Satyawati Tondon [(2010) 8 SCC 110]. The Writ Petition is, accordingly, dismissed. No order as to costs. Miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. Sd/- M.PRABHAKAR RAO ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// \\ SECTION OFFICER To, 1. One CC to Sri Koti Reddy Idamakanti, Advocate [OPUC] 2. One CC to Sri P. Ponna Rao, Deputy Solicitor General of India [OPUC] 3. Three C.D. Copies. Cnr T HIGH COURT DATED:28/03/2025 ORDER WP.No.8273 of 2025 DISMISSING THE W.P. WITHOUT COSTS