ANIRUDH KUMAR AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF CANE LKO. U.P. AND 3 OTHERS
WRIA/4200/2025 · 2025-05-06
Rajesh Singh Chauhan
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 134198 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 134198 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:26107 Court No. - 3 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 4200 of 2025 Petitioner :- Anirudh Kumar And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Cane Lko. U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ashish Kumar Rastogi Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Rajeev Singh,Sudhanshu Chauhan Hon'ble Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J.
1. Heard Sri Ashish Kumar Rastogi, learned counsel for the petitioners, Sri Pankaj Patel, learned Addl. Chief Standing Counsel for opposite party No.1, Sri Rajeev Singh, learned counsel for opposite party No.2 and Sri J.P. Mishra, Advocate holding brief of Sri Sudhanshu Chauhan, learned counsel appearing for opposite parties No. 3 & 4.
2. Sri Rastogi has filed supplementary affidavit, same is taken on record.
3. However, after arguing at some length, learned counsel for the petitioner has requested that the petitioners may be permitted to withdraw this petition to approach the competent authority for redressal of their grievance.
4. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed being withdrawn. However, it is needless to say that for redressal of the grievance the petitioners may approach the competent authority strictly in accordance with law and if the competent authorities are approached as per law, any decision may be taken with expedition. Order Date :- 6.5.2025 Reena/- (Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J.) Digitally signed by :- REENA KANNAUJIYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench