Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010117782025 2025:GAU-AS:10399 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : AB/1298/2025 SHRI AMARJYOTI SARMAH SON OF LATE KARTIK SARMAH, RESIDENT OF PORBOTIA GAON, P.S. PULIBOR, P.O. PARBATIA, DIST. JORHAT, ASSAM PIN- 785006. VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE PP, ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MS. B BHUYAN, MS. P KAKATI,MS M KAKOTY,MR. P K SARMA,MS R SAHIN Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MRIDUL KUMAR KALITA ORDER 05.08.2025 1. Heard Mr. P.K. Sarma, the learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. K.K. Parasar, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the State of Assam. Page No.# 2/3 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner was granted interim bail by this Court on 10.06.2025 and in pursuant to the directions of this Court, he has appeared before the Investigating Officer and has co-operated in the investigation. 3. On the other hand, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor has produced the Case Diary of Biswanath P.S. Case No. 105/2025 and has submitted that the petitioner has appeared before the Investigating Officer in pursuant to the directions of this Court and his statement has also been recorded. However, during investigation, it was found that there are sufficient incriminating materials in the Case Diary. 4. He also opposed the making of the interim bail absolute on the ground that custodial interrogation of the petitioner would be necessary. 5. I have considered the submissions made by the learned counsel for both sides and have gone through the Case Diary of Biswanath P.S. Case No. 105/2025. Though there appears to be some materials against the petitioner in the Case Diary, it also appears that the petitioner has complied with the directions of this Court and has co-operated in the investigation. 6. It is not made clear as to when the petitioner is co-operating in the investigation, why his custodial interrogation is necessary in this case. 7. This Court is of the opinion that if he continues to co-operate in the investigation, the custodial interrogation of the petitioner may not be necessary for fair completion of the investigation of the aforesaid case. Page No.# 3/3 8. For the aforesaid reasons, the interim bail granted to the above- named petitioner on 10.06.2025 is hereby made absolute, with condition Nos. (i) and (ii) attached to the said order remaining intact. 9. Send back the Case Diary. 10. This anticipatory bail application is accordingly disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant