SHRIMATI JANAK NANDINI v. DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF CONSOLIDATION SITAPUR AND ANR
WRIB/948/2003 · 2025-09-22
Manjive Shukla
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 134175 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 134175 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - B No. - 948 of 2003 Court No. - 30 HON'BLE MANJIVE SHUKLA, J.
1. This writ petition is of the year 2003.
2. Case called out.
3. No one is present on behalf of the petitioner, whereas learned Standing Counsel representing the State is present.
4. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
5. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. September 22, 2025 akhilesh/- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Dr. L.P. Misra, Ashok Kumar Shukla, P.L. Mishra Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Parma Nand, Uttam Kumar Verma (Manjive Shukla,J.) Shrimati Janak Nandini .....Petitioner(s) Deputy Director Of Consolidation Sitapur And Anr .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- AKHILESHWAR KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench