SHESH RAJ @ MITHAU and ANR. v. D.D.C. BAHRAICH and 3 ORS.
WRIB/893/2003 · 2025-09-22
Manjive Shukla
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 134168 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 134168 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - B No. - 893 of 2003 Court No. - 30 HON'BLE MANJIVE SHUKLA, J.
1. This writ petition is of the year 2003.
2. Case called out.
3. No one is present on behalf of the petitioners, whereas learned Standing Counsel representing the State is present.
4. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
5. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. September 22, 2025 akhilesh/- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Y. Singh, S.P.Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C ., Afzal Hasan (Manjive Shukla,J.) Shesh Raj @ Mithau And Anr. .....Petitioner(s) D.D.C. Bahraich And 3 Ors. .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- AKHILESHWAR KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- AKHILESHWAR KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench